PDEA: No planting of evidence in 2017 arrest of Yu Yuk Lai daughter | Inquirer News

PDEA: No planting of evidence in 2017 arrest of Yu Yuk Lai daughter

/ 08:30 PM October 26, 2018

PDEA Director General Aaron Aquino. INQUIRER.net file photo / NOY MORCOSO

The chief of the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) denied on Friday that his agents planted evidence in the 2017 raid that led to the arrest of Diana Yu Uy, daughter of convicted “drug queen” Yu Yuk Lai.

Uy was freed from detention on Thursday, after Judge Daniel Villanueva of the Manila Regional Trial Court Branch 49 cleared Uy of drug charges, citing that the agents committed irregularities and that they had an hour to plant evidence against her before the actual raid.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Yu Yuk Lai’s daughter cleared of drug charges

FEATURED STORIES

“PDEA never planted drugs or evidence against anyone. It is never a practice in the agency,” Aquino said in a statement. “PDEA strongly disagrees with the decision and condemns the same.”

Aquino also denied Uy’s claim that one of the agents asked her to name another big-time drug dealer, an alleged practice known as “palit ulo,” or pay P5 million to cancel the raid.

Article continues after this advertisement

According to Uy, the amount was even lowered to P3 million, but she only had P500,000 in her vault that time. Uy said the raid still pushed through despite the agents taking all her money.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Convicted drug queen, daughter face drug raps

Article continues after this advertisement

Aquino stressed that they will file a petition against the court ruling and is now evaluating available pieces of evidence against Uy.

He lamented that the decision is “more like a pleading arguing in favor to the accused” instead of a ruling that resulted from a “fair, impartial, and careful trial and deliberation.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Aquino, likewise, said that what bothers the PDEA most is that the ruling had no factual and legal basis.

Aquino also questioned the timing of the decision, as he said that the supposed date of its issuance was originally set for a hearing on the continuation of the presentation of additional or rebuttal evidence for Uy’s prosecution.

He said PDEA is looking at chasing the responsible government officials that led to the “premature and hasty” decision on Uy’s case.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“The agency will not take this absurdity sitting down,” Aquino said. /jpv

TAGS: Global News, Local news, PDEA

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.