Lagman to JBC: Withdraw nominations of 3 magistrates | Inquirer News

Lagman to JBC: Withdraw nominations of 3 magistrates

/ 06:06 PM August 24, 2018

Associate Justices Teresita Leonardo De Castro, Lucas Bersamin and Diosdado Peralta. INQUIRER file photos

The Judicial and Bar Council (JBC) should withdraw its decision to include Justices Teresita de Castro, Diosdado Peralta, and Lucas Bersamin in the shortlist of nominees for the vacant position of chief justice, an opposition lawmaker rallied on Friday.

READ: 3 SC associate justices in impeach rap named in shortlist for CJ

Article continues after this advertisement

Lamenting that the JBC acted with “indecent alacrity” in shortlisting the three, Albay 1st District Rep. Edcel Lagman made the call, adding that the Council should also reopen the filing of applications for the position of chief justice.

FEATURED STORIES

“The Judicial and Bar Council (JBC) acted with indecent alacrity in shortlisting on Friday morning Justices Teresita De Castro, Diosdado Peralta and Lucas Bersamin as nominees for the vacant position of chief justice,” Lagman said in a statement.

“The JBC is called upon to withdraw momentarily the shortlist and re-open the filing of applications for the position of chief justice,” he also said.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said the JBC should have considered the disqualification of the justices in view of the pending impeachment cases they filed on Thursday against the De Castro, Bersamin, Peralta and four others who voted to kick out former Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno through a quo warranto petition.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: SC justices who ousted Sereno face impeachment complaints | Opposition solons file impeachment raps vs 7 Supreme Court justices

Article continues after this advertisement

Lagman underscored that the impeachment cases are “akin to or even more serious than an administrative case whose pendency bars the appointment of any applicant to a judicial position.”

“The rationalization that the impeachment complaints have not matured to a pending case is flawed because upon the filing of the said impeachment complaints and before they are dismissed, said impeachment complaints are deemed pending just like unresolved criminal and administrative cases,” he argued. /jpv

Article continues after this advertisement

LOOK: Impeach complaints vs anti-Sereno SC associate justices

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: JBC, Lagman, Local news

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.