Marquez on $21.9M judiciary fund ‘misuse’: ‘It’s an old, recycled issue’ | Inquirer News

Marquez on $21.9M judiciary fund ‘misuse’: ‘It’s an old, recycled issue’

/ 02:59 PM July 02, 2018

Jose Midas Marquez —LYN RILLON

Court Administrator Jose Midas Marquez, one of the shortlisted candidates for the Supreme Court Associate Justice post, has dismissed as a “recycled issue” allegations that he misused a $21.9-million loan from the Word Bank.

Marquez has been slapped with a criminal complaint before the Office of the Ombudsman by a certain Rjhay Laurea for violation of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act and Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Court admin faces raps over ‘misuse’ of $21.9-M judiciary fund

FEATURED STORIES

“It’s an old, recycled issue that does not even involve me. In fact, the JBC (Judicial and Bar Council) has already disregarded this,” Marquez said hours after the case was filed against him on Monday.

“The World Bank Project and funds never passed me despite my numerous positions. That was under the Program Management Office or PMO, which was never under me,” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Laurea is the same person who filed before the JBC an opposition to the nomination of Marquez for Associate Justice of the high court in place of Presbitero Velasco Jr., who will retire this August.

Article continues after this advertisement

Marquez said he never had a copy of the aide memoir of the World Bank that was used as basis for the criminal complaint and JBC opposition.

Article continues after this advertisement

He pointed out that he “was never ordered or even requested, by any authority to comment on the same (Aide Memoir or the World Bank report).”

Marquez said the aide memoir is strictly confidential and usually not disclosed to the public.

Article continues after this advertisement

The aide memoir was first made public when the impeachment case was filed against the late Chief Justice Renato Corona, and was one of the issued raised against him.

“It was never substantiated even by the succeeding leadership in the court. Not then. Not now,” Marquez said.   /kga

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: court, Graft, Ombudsman

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.