Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us| Services
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Parol Lantern Parade
Sta Lucia Realty

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:



Affiliates

 
Inquirer Headlines / Nation Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > News > Inquirer Headlines > Nation

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send as an e-mail     Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  

  RELATED STORIES  





imns



Sulpicio cries bias, seeks stop to hearing

By Allison Lopez
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 02:15:00 07/08/2008

Filed Under: Sulpicio ferry disaster, Maritime Accidents, Legal issues, Waterway & Maritime Transport

MANILA, Philippines—Sulpicio Lines Inc. Monday asked the Manila Regional Trial Court to stop the Board of Marine Inquiry (BMI) from pursuing its investigation of the sinking of the ill-fated MV Princess of the Stars for alleged “lack of authority and bias.”

Sulpicio Lines filed a prohibition/injunction case with an urgent prayer for temporary restraining order, saying that the Maritime Industry Authority (MARINA) was the rightful body to conduct the inquiry into the June 21 incident.

A P650,000 damage suit, which was raffled off to RTC Branch 24, was also filed against respondents BMI chair Rear Adm. Ramon Liwag, retired Chief Engineer Bonifacio Balentic, retired Chief Engineer Diosdado Ramos, retired Master Mariner Capt. Benjamin Mata, retired Master Mariner Capt. Amado Romillo and Commodore Ramon Reblora; and Philippine Coast Guard chief Vice Adm. Wilfredo Tamayo.

Tamayo told the Philippine Daily Inquirer that the BMI inquiry, which started June 25, will continue Tuesday unless it receives a court injunction.

In its 14-page complaint, Sulpicio Lines said the 1976 law that paved the way for the creation of a BMI during marine accidents was superseded by the 2004 act that transferred its jurisdiction over shipowners to the MARINA.

The 1976 Philippine Coast Guard Law said the BMI’s role was to “investigate marine accidents or casualties relative to the liability of shipowners and officers,” Sulpicio Lines said.

However, Sulpicio said that Republic Act No. 9295, which took effect in 2004, transferred to MARINA the investigatory powers over shipowners on “all matters pertaining to their business operations, including maritime incidents and casualties.”

“Assuming the Coast Guard Philippine Merchant Marine Rules and Regulations still applies and that the BMI could still continue to investigate, its investigatory power is now limited to investigating marine officers only and no longer includes a shipowner or ship operator like SLI,” the shipping firm said.

A 1997 Official Gazette of the MARINA also stated that the investigation of marine incidents fell under the MARINA’s jurisdiction—and as such, it was already conducting a separate probe on the MV Princess of the Stars, Sulpicio Lines said.

“The defendants convened themselves as an investigating board to investigate said maritime incident involving MV Princess of the Stars when actually, they have no legal authority to do so,” Sulpicio Lines said.

“Hence, the current investigation by the BMI of the MV Princess of the Stars tragedy is irregular, illegal and null and void for want of jurisdiction and authority,” it said.

The petition criticized the BMI for conducting an “inquisition,” where witnesses were “badgered and oftentimes publicly humiliated with uncalled-for remarks from the board members like ‘Your vessel is not stable! You are negligent! You have no business being a safety officer!’”

The statements by the BMI members showed bias and prejudgment and added to the “pervasive negative publicity” against them, according to Sulpicio Lines.

“The board chairman has endeavored to display fairness but majority of the members have already made up their minds as to the ‘guilt’ of Sulpicio Lines even before the proceedings could be included,” the shipping company said.

For the “loss of goodwill and business standing attributable to the void BMI proceedings,” the shipping company also demanded P500,000 for moral damages, P100,000 for lawyer’s fees, and P50,000 for litigation expenses.

Last week, Sulpicio Lines filed a P4.4-million damage suit at the Manila RTC against officials of the Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration (PAGASA) for their “inexcusable neglect of duty and gross incompetence” in reporting the movement of Typhoon “Frank” (international codename: Fengshen). With a report from Leila B. Salaverria



Copyright 2009 Philippine Daily Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk.
Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate.
Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer
Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets,
Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines
Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94

Share

RELATED STORIES:

OTHER STORIES:


  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2009 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Xoom
SF FilAm Chamber of Commerce
Property Guide
Inquirer Blogs