Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us
 
Thu, Jan 08, 2009 12:36 PM Philippines      25°C to 33°C
   HOME       NEWS     SPORTS     SHOWBIZ AND STYLE     TECHNOLOGY     BUSINESS     OPINION      GLOBAL NATION    SERVICES
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Robinsons Land Corp.
Paskong Pinoy

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:

 
Breaking News / Nation Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > News > Breaking News > Nation

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send as an e-mail     Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  





imns



Presidential debates for RP scored

Mandatory debates unconstitutional--lawyer

By Jerome Aning
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 20:56:00 11/16/2008

Filed Under: Eleksyon 2010, Elections

MANILA--A former lawyer of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo assailed on Sunday a proposal to require presidential candidates to participate in public debates, saying that would be unconstitutional.

Lawyer Romulo Macalintal said the Commission on Elections could only invite presidential as well as vice presidential candidates to debate but could not impose sanctions should they refuse to participate.

"To make it (attending debates) mandatory is to add another requirement for a presidential candidate to that provided for in the Constitution," Macalintal told the Philippine Daily Inquirer.

He pointed out that Article 7, Section 2 of the Constitution only provided that a candidate for president and vice president be at least 40 years old, a registered voter, able to read and write, a Filipino citizen by birth and a resident of the Philippines for at least 10 years prior to the election.

Macalintal, election lawyer of President Macapagal-Arroyo during the 2004 polls, was reacting to a proposal by Comelec Commissioner Rene Sarmiento who suggested Friday that the election body passed a resolution requiring candidates to appear in a series of debates so that the voting public could gauge the capacity, potential and eloquence of the candidates.

Macalintal said that a requirement to attend debates would suffer the same fate of a law that required public officials to undergo mandatory drug tests.

The law was recently struck down as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, saying that the Charter's provisions enumerating requirements for people desiring to run for elective public positions in the executive and legislative branches did not impose such a requirement.

"At any rate, by now people already know the qualifications of the persons expected to vie for the presidency and no amount of debate could change the public's perception. Their performance or non-performance in their respective areas had long been gauged by the voters," Macalintal said.

Instead of sponsoring debates, Macalintal said, the Comelec should concentrate on educating voters on the proper exercise of their right of suffrage "so they'll vote not on the basis of the ability of candidates to sing or dance but on the basis of the true qualities of a leader."

"Voters here tend to be too personality-oriented. Hence, it is Comelec's duty under the law to teach them how to choose the right candidates," Macalintal added.



Copyright 2009 Philippine Daily Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



Share


OTHER STORIES:



  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2009 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
CItiglobal
Inquirer Mobile
INQ GAMES
Inquirer VDO