‘Coplan Armado mere subterfuge’ to rub out ‘jueteng’ rival
MANILA, Philippines—The police operation plan carried out by Supt. Hansel Marantan purportedly to neutralize a crime ring was a “mere subterfuge” to kill a competitor in “jueteng” that has continued to flourish despite well-publicized government pledges to eliminate the illegal numbers racket, investigators said.
Findings by the National Bureau of Investigation of the
Jan. 6 incident in Atimonan, Quezon province, showed that the Presidential Anti-Organized Crime Commission (PAOCC) disapproved the plan, called “Coplan Armado,” but nevertheless released P100,000 to Marantan’s group for intelligence buildup.
In its executive report, which was approved in full by President Aquino, the NBI, however, cleared the PAOCC of any role in the “rubout” in Atimonan that left alleged jueteng operator Vic Siman and 12 others, including police and military personnel, dead.
Piecing together testimonies and documents, the investigators established that Siman engaged in video “karera” operations in Calamba City, Laguna province, before venturing into jueteng, a multibillion-peso activity that the late Interior Secretary Jesse Robredo had campaigned against because of its pernicious effects.
Siman’s video karera operation was “greatly affected” by the entry of a certain ‘Ka Tita,’ who used to operate a nightclub in Ermita, Manila. A rivalry soon followed between the newcomer and Siman, the reputed “gambling lord” of Laguna.
Ka Tita’s move to Laguna coincided with the transfer there of Marantan from the Highway Patrol Group in Quezon City, the NBI said.
Protected by Marantan
When the video karera operations did not yield much profit, Ka Tita shifted to jueteng, undermining Siman’s operations. Meantime, police stepped up operations against illegal gambling, mainly targeting Siman’s operations.
Even so, Siman maintained control of the jueteng operations in the province. Still, Ka Tita’s operations flourished “unhampered and unmolested” by the police, since her business was “under the protective mantle” of Marantan, the NBI said.
To keep his hold on jueteng in the province, Siman banded with other gambling operators in the Southern Tagalog area, identified as “Don Ramon” and “Fajardo,” eventually establishing contact with the criminal syndicate “Batang Kubo.”
Nixon Kua’s murder
Over time, the rivalry led to the killings of civilian and police protectors of Siman and Ka Tita, the investigators said. The NBI was working on leads that the real killers of former newsman Nelson “Nixon” Kua were hired guns from Siman’s group.
Given the dynamics in the province, Siman was also “after the head” of Marantan while the police officer was using his authority to “silence” Siman, the NBI said.
Coplan Armado was based on “intelligence information” gathered by Marantan about the alleged involvement of several individuals in jueteng and in the “turf wars” among the financiers, it said.
But the NBI observed “misinformation” brought about by a “defective and unverified” Coplan Armado. For instance, there were many “targets” mentioned in the plan but only Siman was part of the convoy.
If indeed Siman’s group was on a criminal mission, they would not have used vehicles registered in their names. And if indeed private armed groups were hired to liquidate certain personalities, they would have had in their possession unlicensed firearms, it said.
But all the firearms recovered from the victims at the crime scene were licensed, except for one, the NBI said.
Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:
Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94