SC defers action on petitions vs cybercrime law | Inquirer News

SC defers action on petitions vs cybercrime law

By: - Reporter / @T2TupasINQ
/ 12:46 PM October 02, 2012

INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—The Supreme Court wants to further study the various petitions questioning Republic Act 10175 or the Cybercrime Prevention Act, Public Information Office Chief Gleo Guerra said Tuesday.

“The SC did not issue a TRO in the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 [and] petitions are up for further study,” Guerra said in a statement.

Article continues after this advertisement

The high court deferred the deliberation on the controversial law to next Tuesday.

FEATURED STORIES

Guerra said the high court en banc (full court) has a quorum with 10 Justices present.

Associate Justice Lucas Bersamin, Diosdado Peralta and Mariano Del Castillo are on official business attending the Justice Sector Peer-Assisted Network Community of Practice Meetings for Information Systems Professionals in the Justice Sector and for Public Prosecutors in Croatia on Sept. 27 and 28 and Oct. 1 and 2 while Justice Roberto Abad is on official leave. Justice Martin Villarama is back from official business trip abroad.

Article continues after this advertisement

So far, seven petitions from various organizations have been filed with the high court, all claiming that several provisions of the Cybercrime Prevention Act violates the 1987Constitution specifically those on freedom of speech, equal protection of the law, right to privacy, illegal searches and seizures, double jeopardy, and libel.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Crime, News, petitions, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.