Court orders trial of 5 accused in fatal hazing of Benilde student | Inquirer News

Court orders trial of 5 accused in fatal hazing of Benilde student

By: - Reporter / @MRamosINQ
/ 07:30 PM June 10, 2018

Guillo Cesar Servando, an 18-year-old De La Salle-College of St. Benilde student, who died following suspected fraternity initiation rites done by members of the Tau Gamma Phi St. Benilde chapter. (File Photo by LYN RILLON / Philippine Daily Inquirer)

The family of alleged hazing victim Guillo Cesar Servando has found new hope in seeking justice for their slain loved one.

The Court of Appeals has revived the trial of five members of Tau Gamma Phi fraternity who had been indicted for the hazing death of the 18-year-old College of Saint Benilde student.

Article continues after this advertisement

The decision of the appeals court’s Special Fifth Division directing a Makati City Regional Trial Court (RTC) to proceed with the trial of the accused came nearly four years after Servando was died in June 2014 during hazing rites held inside the condominium unit of a fraternity member.

FEATURED STORIES

It said Presiding Judge Honorio Guanlao Makati RTC Branch 57 erred in junking the criminal complaint filed against the five accused – Daniel Paul Martin Bautista, Vic Angelo Dy, Michael David Castaneda, Francisco Joel Villegal and Justice Francis Reyes – due to the prosecution’s failure to present the witnesses during the pretrial.

“While courts recognize the accused’s right to speedy trial and adheres to a policy of speedy administration of justice, the state may not be deprived of a reasonable opportunity to fairly prosecute criminals,” read a portion of the appeals court’s 25-page ruling.

Article continues after this advertisement

“How can there be denial of private respondents’ right to speedy trial when we only speak of no more than seven days of supposed delay?” it asked.

Article continues after this advertisement

Besides, the appellate court said it was not even established that the witnesses had formally received the summonses for them to appear at the three separate hearings held in December 2015.

“The Supreme Court has invariably held that delay per se does not offend one’s right to speedy trial. It is the unjustified delay which does,” it argued. /atm

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: fatal hazing, Tau Gamma Phi

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.