Lawyer’s fees received by gov’t counsels in Piatco case are illegal, CA declares | Inquirer News

Lawyer’s fees received by gov’t counsels in Piatco case are illegal, CA declares

/ 07:56 PM June 08, 2018

Court of Appeals

The Court of Appeals. (Photo from the Philippine Daily Inquirer)

The lawyer’s fees received by the government’s legal team for the arbitration case against the Philippine International Air Terminals Company (Piatco) are illegal, the Court of Appeals (CA) said in its recent ruling.

In a decision dated June 4, 2018 the appeals court’s special 11th division affirmed the ruling of the Mandaluyong Regional Trial Court dismissing the government’s bid to recognize the final award of the $6 million for the cost of arbitration proceedings.

Article continues after this advertisement

The International Court of Arbitration ruled that Piatco, builder of the Ninoy Aquino International Airport Terminal 3 (NAIA 3), shouldered the costs of the case amounting to $24 million. Twenty-five percent of the said fee—$6 million—will be given to the claimant, which is the Philippine government team.

FEATURED STORIES

In 2012, the government sought a recognition of the ruling to which Piatco has opposed.

The Mandaluyong Court ruled that the award was not enforceable under Philippine laws for being against public policy.

Article continues after this advertisement

The lower court ruled that the Procurement Law has been violated when the government tapped foreign counsels and legal consultants without conducting a public bidding.

Article continues after this advertisement

Aggrieved, the Philippine government took the case to the CA.

Article continues after this advertisement

The government won before the appeals court’s 17th division but Piatco filed a motion for reconsideration.

The Special 11th Division, in its recent ruling said “any enforcement and recognition of the Final Award, whose object is defined as 25% of those illegal government expenses is against Philippine public policy, indeed against Philippine law, and should be refused.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“Besides, attorney’s fees are not granted every time a party prevails in a suit because of the policy that no premium should be placed on the right to litigate,” the appeals court said.

Former Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno was part of the government’s legal team that defended the government in the arbitration case against Piatco.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Others in the Philippine team are White and Case, Allen & Gledhill, Sycip Salazar Hernandez & Gatmaitan and Follosco Morallos & Herce law firms. Also in the team are former Justices Florentino Feliciano and Vicente Mendoza. /jpv

TAGS: Arbitration, Piatco, RTC, ruling

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.