BI reiterates Arroyos will be barred from leaving country | Inquirer News

BI reiterates Arroyos will be barred from leaving country

/ 01:30 AM November 18, 2011

Unless ordered otherwise by Justice Secretary Leila de Lima, former President and now Pampanga Representative Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and her husband, Jose Miguel Arroyo, will be barred from leaving the country, whether Friday or Saturday, the Bureau of Immigration (BI) said Thursday.

BI spokesperson Antoinette Mangrobang told Radyo Inquirer 990AM that immigration officers had no choice but to implement the watch-list order from the Department of Justice (DOJ).

“As of now, the existing order in our data base is the watch-list order. In the absence of a contrary order, that will remain. In that case we are constrained from allowing them to leave. They still cannot leave,” Mangrobang said in Filipino.

Article continues after this advertisement

“It’s not that the BI wants to defy the Supreme Court, but there is a procedure. All lawyers know this,” Mangrobang said.

FEATURED STORIES

Famous or not

Former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo

Mangrobang said that when the Arroyos presented themselves at the airport on Tuesday, the immigration officers on duty did not have any order from the DOJ removing the Arroyos from the watch list.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Our immigration officers have no choice but to implement the watch list,” she said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Mangrobang said the BI had never allowed anyone on the watch list to leave the country on the strength of a handcarried document lifting the ban.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The immigration officer is not authorized to accept a court order at the airport,” Mangrobang said. “There is a process for this. The commissioner must issue a directive to the immigration officer, and this must be encoded into our data base before the immigration officer can act on the case.”

She said the procedure applied to all, whether the person involved was famous or not.

Article continues after this advertisement

Still, it is up to the court to decide whether the immigration officers involved could be held in contempt.

“This is part of our job. If we are cited in contempt in the performance of our job, we are ready to face the consequences,” she said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

(For the full report, listen to Radyo Inquirer 990AM.)

TAGS: DoJ, Government, Immigration, Politics, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.