Presentation of evidence on de Lima’s obstruction case deferred | Inquirer News

Presentation of evidence on de Lima’s obstruction case deferred

/ 07:30 PM July 21, 2017

The presentation of evidence on the obstruction of justice case against Senator Leila De Lima has been deferred after her camp challenged the court’s admission of the opposition’s judicial affidavit of witness and Oriental Mindoro Representative Reynaldo V. Umali.

During Friday’s hearing, Atty. Teodoro Rigoroso, counsel for De Lima said Umali’s judicial affidavit, which was prepared and submitted by government, did not comply with the rules.

He said the original and the amended judicial affidavit of Umali bore the same date of May 17, 2017. Rigoroso added that a jurat and judicial affidavit were not properly attested.

Article continues after this advertisement

A judicial affidavit is a written statement of a witness sworn under oath while a jurat is the clause at the end of the document, like an affidavit, stating the date, place, and name of the person before whom it was sworn. It also serves as proof of an oath taken before an administering officer.

FEATURED STORIES

“Only the signature page was not changed but the contents were altered,” Rigoroso pointed out.

“Second or corrected judicial affidavit was not properly attested. In the point [of view] of law, [it is] not truly a judicial affidavit,” Mr. Rigoroso argued. He added that if the judicial affidavit has been amended then it has to undergo the same procedure as the original affidavit.

Article continues after this advertisement

The De Lima camp used the same tact of the Office of the Solicitor-General at the Supreme Court (SC). The OSG said De Lima’s petition is considered a mere scrap of paper due to the questionable execution of the jurat in her petition.

Article continues after this advertisement

Quezon City Metropolitan Judge Ma. Ludmila D. Pio-Lim clarified with the prosecution if the witness executed a judicial affidavit, to which the prosecution answered in the affirmative.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The judicial affidavit was changed – to add or delete certain matters. Were these changes effected on the same day (May 17, 2017)?”  Pio-Lim asked.

Pio-Lim gave the prosecution 10 days to submit their comment on the issue raised by De Lima’s camp.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Court has reset the hearing for the prosecution’s admission of evidence on August 25 to pave way for De Lima’s motion for reconsideration.

The case stemmed from De Lima’s alleged advice to her former aide Ronnie P. Dayan to skip the House of Representatives’ Justice Committee’s hearing on the proliferation of drug trade inside the national penitentiary.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

De Lima is currently detained in the police headquarters in Camp Crame, Quezon City for the drug trading charges.

TAGS: Leila de Lima

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.