Damage suit by SAF 44 kin vs Purisima, Napeñas up for resolution | Inquirer News
P12-M CASE

Damage suit by SAF 44 kin vs Purisima, Napeñas up for resolution

/ 12:20 AM December 10, 2016

Retired Director Getulio Napeñas and retired Director General Alan Purisima. INQUIRER FILE PHOTOS

Retired Director Getulio Napeñas and retired Director General Alan Purisima. INQUIRER FILE PHOTOS

LA TRINIDAD, BENGUET—A local court is set to resolve a P12-million damage claim filed against retired Director General Alan Purisima, retired Director Getulio Napeñas and three Army officials by the family of the late Senior Insp. Getnad Tabdi.

Tabdi was one of the 44 Special Action Force (SAF) commandos killed in Mamasapano, Maguindanao province, during an operation to capture a suspected terrorist on Jan. 25, 2015.

Article continues after this advertisement

The case, which was filed last year, was submitted for resolution on Nov. 5 in the sala of Judge Danilo Camacho of the Regional Trial Court Branch 62 here.

FEATURED STORIES

Tabdi’s widow, Lhea, and his parents Edna and Garcia blamed Purisima, a former Philippine National Police chief, for failing to ensure that the artillery support for the SAF members would arrive to protect them when they were cornered by armed militants in the course of arresting Zulkifli bin Hir alias Marwan.

Marwan was killed in the operation.

Article continues after this advertisement

Napeñas, a former SAF commander, was included in the complaint for negligence and for not following the chain of command in the conduct of the operation.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Tabdi family also sued Maj. Gen. Edmundo Pangilinan, former commander of the Army’s 6th Infantry Division; Lt. Gen. Rustico Guerrero, area commander of the AFP Western Mindanao Command; and Col. Gener del Rosario, brigade commander of the AFP 1st Mechanized Infantry Brigade.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Had the artillery support been given early, the death of Tabdi could have been avoided,” the family said in its complaint.

The family asked for P11,368,500 in compensatory damages, representing the income Tabdi would have earned had he not been killed. Tabdi was receiving a monthly salary of P44,730.

Article continues after this advertisement

The family also demanded P500,000 in moral damages, P200,000 as exemplary damages and payment of lawyer’s fee.

In their complaint, Tabdi’s family members said they lost not only a husband and a son but also a “material provider.”—KIMBERLIE QUITASOL

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Army, damage claim, SAF 44

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.