Appeals court throws out graft case vs De Oro mayor, city treasurer | Inquirer News

Appeals court throws out graft case vs De Oro mayor, city treasurer

/ 01:18 AM October 20, 2016

CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY—Mayor Oscar Moreno and another official won a petition at the Court of Appeals (CA) against a graft case involving a 2014 tax deal with a Japanese food company that operates in this city.

The CA junked the graft case against Moreno and acting city treasurer Glenn Banez for a deal that reduced the tax liability of food company Ajinomoto, maker of seasonings, from P2.9 million to P300,000.

“Justice is alive,” said Moreno in a statement released after the CA ruling’s release on Tuesday.

Article continues after this advertisement

The ruling threw out a Feb. 15 order of the Office of the Ombudsman recommending the dismissal of Moreno and Banez and the filing of charges against them.

FEATURED STORIES

No council OK

The case had been filed by William Guialani, former village chief of Taglimao, who accused Moreno and Banez of grave misconduct for entering into the deal without approval by the city council.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Ombudsman, in an order dated Aug. 14, 2015, sided with Guialani and ordered Moreno’s and Banez’s dismissal. The antigraft body affirmed this on Feb. 15 this year.

Article continues after this advertisement

Moreno ran to the CA, which not only junked the Ombudsman’s order but also dismissed the administrative cases against Moreno and Banez.

Article continues after this advertisement

The CA, in its ruling, said there was no substantial evidence that Moreno was involved in the deal. There is also no evidence of irregularity in the deal, the CA said.

The court said the tax deal also did not need city council approval. “Since no law has been violated, no grave misconduct was ever committed,” said the CA.

Article continues after this advertisement

It said the city government did not lose money but earned P300,000 contrary to the Ombudsman’s argument that there was “diversion of public funds.”

The court affirmed Moreno’s claim that the Ombudsman violated his right to due process when it did not accept his counter affidavit. —JIGGER JERUSALEM

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Court of Appeals, Graft, Oscar Moreno

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.