MMDA: ‘One-truck lane’ policy in C5 not in NLEX | Inquirer News

MMDA: ‘One-truck lane’ policy in C5 not in NLEX

By: - Reporter / @NCorralesINQ
/ 05:10 PM September 05, 2014

FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines — The Metro Manila Development Authority (MMDA) on Friday belied reports that its “one truck-lane policy” was to blame for the heavy traffic at the North Luzon Expressway (NLEX).

“The cause of traffic is not the one truck-lane policy. The traffic in A. Bonifacio (Manila) is because of the trucks going to the Philippine Ports Authority that is already congested due to limited open gates,” Tolentino said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The one truck-lane policy is only implemented in C-5. That’s 20 kilometers away,” he added.

FEATURED STORIES

In a television interview, Tolentino said delays in the processing of trucks entering the port of Manila could also be behind traffic congestion.

He said the NLEX management has apologized for the misinformation.

Article continues after this advertisement

On Friday, the NLEX management said the one truck-lane policy of the MMDA and in Manila was to blame.

Article continues after this advertisement

It, however, retracted its statement.

Article continues after this advertisement

On Friday, motorists were experiencing a nine-kilometer long traffic along the Nlex going to Manila due to the volume of trucks going to the Philippine Ports Authority.

RELATED STORIES

Traffic at standstill in NLEX-EDSA area

Article continues after this advertisement

One-lane rule for trucks tried on C-5 today

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Metro Manila, NLEX, traffic

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.