Ombudsman, Sandigan ordered to answer Napoles petitions to junk plunder case | Inquirer News

Ombudsman, Sandigan ordered to answer Napoles petitions to junk plunder case

/ 07:50 PM August 19, 2014

Janet Lim Napoles. POOL PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—The Supreme Court on Tuesday ordered the Sandiganbayan and Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales to answer separate petitions filed by businesswoman Janet Lim Napoles and her other co-accused in the pork barrel scam.

High Court spokesman Theodore Te said Morales, together with the Sandiganbayan First, Third and Fifth Divisions were given 10 days to answer the petitions filed by Napoles, nephew Ronald John Lim and daughter Jo Christine.

Article continues after this advertisement

The high court, according to Te, consolidated the two petitions filed by Napoles against the anti-graft court’s first and fifth division while the third division will be dealt with separately.

FEATURED STORIES

The three petitions asked the court to dismiss her plunder indictment by the Ombudsman and asked that the warrants issued by the Sandiganbayan First, Third and Fifth Divisions against her be recalled, citing that she could not be validly charged as she was not a public officer.

Lim is facing cases for plunder and graft while Jo Christine is facing a case for graft and corruption.

Article continues after this advertisement

RELATED STORIES

Article continues after this advertisement

Napoles seeks SC relief from plunder cases

Napoles prays using rosary given by Pope John Paul II

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Nation, News, Plunder

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.