Palace on Jardeleza: No endorsement | Inquirer News
JBC SHORT LIST

Palace on Jardeleza: No endorsement

/ 06:02 AM August 15, 2014

Communications Secretary Herminio Coloma Jr. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines–Despite filing a legal reply to the Supreme Court defending Solicitor General Francis Jardeleza against the Judicial and Bar Council’s (JBC) selection process that rejected Jardeleza, Malacañang on Thursday said this was not an indication that President Aquino wanted to appoint the government’s chief legal counsel to the high tribunal.

“I think the Executive Secretary’s office was simply complying with the lawful order of the Supreme Court to give a comment, and the comment was on the issues that were raised regarding the selection process of the JBC. I don’t think that the purpose of the comment was to indirectly indicate any preference for any nominee,” Communications Secretary Herminio Coloma Jr. told a news briefing.

Article continues after this advertisement

Executive Secretary Paquito Ochoa is a respondent in the petition against the JBC that Jardeleza filed in the Supreme Court. Jardeleza wants to have his name included in the short list of nominees to fill the vacancy in the court left by the retirement last May of Associate Justice Roberto Abad.

FEATURED STORIES

The President has only until Aug. 21 to name a new associate justice as the Constitution mandates that the vacancy has to be filled within three months.

Issue of integrity

Article continues after this advertisement

Even though he received the required minimum four votes, Jardeleza was not included in the short list of nominees that the JBC submitted to Malacañang, because of an issue of integrity that Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno raised against Jardeleza.

Article continues after this advertisement

In its comment to Jardeleza’s petition, the JBC said that the integrity issue involved a case that was “very important to the Republic,” but did not give any details.

Article continues after this advertisement

Ochoa, as the President’s alter ego, was impleaded in Jardeleza’s petition which asked the high court to issue a temporary restraining order against the Chief Executive from appointing an associate justice.

In his comment to Jardeleza’s petition, Ochoa defended Jardeleza, urging the JBC to include Jardeleza’s name in the short list and declare unconstitutional the integrity rule of the JBC.

Article continues after this advertisement

Coloma said he was unaware if President Aquino had ever tried to find out from Jardeleza what the integrity issue was raised against him by the JBC.

“What I know is that the President has had meetings with the Solicitor General when the SolGen was involved in preparing the motion for reconsideration [of the Supreme Court decision outlawing the Disbursement Acceleration Program]. That is the latest that I know about their possible interaction,” Coloma said.–Nikko Dizon

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Malacañang, Palacew, Paquito Ochoa, Philippines, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.