Abad backtracks, claims lump sum funds only P48.1B | Inquirer News

Abad backtracks, claims lump sum funds only P48.1B

/ 02:58 PM August 06, 2014

Budget Sec. Florencio “Butch” Abad. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO/ ALANAH TORRALBA

MANILA, Philippines–Budget Secretary Florencio “Butch” Abad on Wednesday said only P48.1 billion in the P2.6 trillion proposed national budget for 2015 is classified as “lump sum” funds.

During the Development Budget Coordinating Committee hearing at the House of Representatives, Abad in his presentation said these are the only lump sum — or essentially, non-itemized — portion of the special purpose funds (SPF).

Article continues after this advertisement

Lump sum funds usually pertain to the graft-ridden Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) and Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP) that lawmakers and President Benigno Aquino had used at their discretion, respectively, before the Supreme Court declared these funds unconstitutional.

FEATURED STORIES

The government had said the budget would be cleared from graft-tainted lump sum funds.

Now without the PDAF and DAP, lump sum funds under SPF now amount to P48.1 billion or down from P51.3 billion in the 2014 budget, Abad said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Abad backtracked from his statement when he presented the budget to Congress for the first time.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said P501.67 billion is set aside for the SPF, which he said are “lump sum in nature.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“The total amount that pertains to the Special Purpose Funds that I mentioned is P501.670 billion, or about 29 percent of the new General Appropriations Act. The rest are department and agency budgets,” Abad had said.

Under the lump sum SPF are calamity funds, contingent funds, rehabilitation and reconstruction program, as well as allocations to local government units such as special shares, Abad’s presentation showed.

Article continues after this advertisement

Abad said these are not disaggregated because because calamities and crisis that may be funded with these cannot be anticipated.

“By nature of the funds, they have to be lump sum,” Abad said.

Meanwhile, at least P330.5 billion of the SPF is not lump sum but “disaggregated” to budgetary support to government corporations, allocations to LGUs, e-government fund, international commitments fund, miscellaneous personnel benefits fund, and pension and gratuity fund, according to the presentation.

Also, at least P816 billion were under automatic appropriations such as the Internal Revenue Allotment,  basically the local government unit’s annual share from the proceeds of the national internal revenue taxes, which has long been seen as the pork barrel fund equivalent for local officials.

Abad said a bulk of the SPFs are disaggregated and not lump sum.

Overall, the SPF for 2015 amounts to P1.1946 trillion or 45.8 percent of the total P2.6 trillion proposed budget, the presentation said.

The committee, chaired by Abad in representing President  Benigno  Aquino III’s finance team, is comprised of Finance Secretary Cesar  Purisima, Internal Revenue chief Kim Henares, National Economic and Development Authority Director General Arsenio  Balisacan, and  Bangko  Sentral  ng  Pilipinas  Governor Amado  Tetangco  Jr.

The committee aims to assess the overall economic targets, expenditure levels, revenue projection and the financing plan in relation to the national budget.
RELATED STORIES

Abad slammed for Aquino’s ‘big power’ in proposed 2015 budget 

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Palace presents P2.6Tr national budget to House 

TAGS: budget, lump sum, Nation, News, Pork barrel

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.