Congressman hopeful of support for impeachment drive vs SC justices | Inquirer News

Congressman hopeful of support for impeachment drive vs SC justices

/ 09:03 PM January 04, 2014

Oriental Mindoro Rep. Reynaldo Umali. FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines – Oriental Mindoro Representative Reynaldo Umali expects to get the backing of his colleagues in a move to impeach Supreme Court justices for their flip-flopping rulings on the congressional pork barrel and the disqualification of a colleague that he said threatened the independence of Congress.

Umali said the opposition of Speaker Feliciano Belmonte to the impeachment case and the ruling Liberal Party’s distancing itself from the move were not deterrents to his plan.

Article continues after this advertisement

His impeachment move was prompted by two decisions of the high court upholding the Commission on Elections’ disqualification of Marinduque Rep. Regina Reyes and declaring Congress’ pork barrel unconstitutional.

FEATURED STORIES

Umali said the Reyes decision was inconsistent with previous rulings that the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal (HRET), not the Comelec, had jurisdiction over cases against proclaimed election winners, while the pork barrel ruling represented a flip-flop from previous decisions upholding the lump sum fund.

Umali said there was a good chance he could convince enough colleagues to back him up even if the Speaker and the Liberal Party were not joining the impeachment drive.

Article continues after this advertisement

“That was how it was in the (Chief Justice Renato) Corona impeachment, in the (Ombudsman Merceditas) Mercy Gutierrez case. It did not start with a party position, it started with a small group including myself, which explained our way toward impeachment,” he said in a telephone interview.

Article continues after this advertisement

“When we sit down to discuss all of these [latest impeachment complaints], we will see,” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Umali said he was trying to protect Congress as an institution because a coequal branch was muzzling its powers.

He said it had always been his position that the Supreme Court could not even review decisions of the HRET, since the Constitution makes the HRET the sole judge of all contests relating to the election, returns and qualifications of House members.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said at least 169 members have signed his resolution asserting the HRET jurisdiction, and he believes there was a good chance they would also support an impeachment complaint pushing the same stance.

Umali said he would be working on the draft of his impeachment complaint until January 20, when Congress resumes session.

He said he wanted to ensure that it would have both form and substance to ensure that the lapses in the Corona impeachment articles would not be repeated.

Umali is hoping to get the support of one third of the House, or 97 members, to fast-track the complaint.

Related Stories:

No basis to impeach SC justices over pork, lawmaker’s disqualification – lawyer

LP solon eyes impeach raps vs SC justices

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Marinduque lawmaker threatens to file impeach rap vs SC justice Velasco

TAGS: House of Representatives, Impeachment, Politics, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.