SC orders gov’t to comment on petitions questioning RH Law | Inquirer News

SC orders gov’t to comment on petitions questioning RH Law

By: - Reporter / @T2TupasINQ
/ 08:43 PM January 15, 2013

MANILA, Philippines—The Supreme Court has not issued a temporary restraining order against RH Law,  instead, it ordered the government to comment on petitions questioning the law’s constitutionality.

Respondents to the petitions include Executive Secretary Paquito Ochoa, Budget Secretary Florencio Abad, Health Secretary Enrique Ona, Education Secretary Armin Luistro and Interior Secretary Manuel Roxas II.

The government, through the Office of the Solicitor General, has 10 days to comment on the petition.

Article continues after this advertisement

Currently, there are two petitions filed with the Supreme Court. The first was filed by couple James and Lovely Imbong on behalf of their minor children.

FEATURED STORIES

They said Republic Act10354 or the Act Providing for a National Policy on Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health (RH Law) “mocks the nation’s Filipino culture–noble and lofty in its values and holdings on life, motherhood and family life–now the fragile lifeblood of a treasured culture that today stands solitary but proud in contrast to other nations.”

They said the new law violates the Constitution which upholds the ideal of an unconditional respect for life and aspires for the establishment of policies that create opportunities to harness the economic potential of every Filipino.

Article continues after this advertisement

The second petition was filed by the Alliance for the Family Foundation Philippines, Inc. or ALFI.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Malacañang, Nation, News, RH law, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.