Prosecution remains confident of Corona conviction | Inquirer News

Prosecution remains confident of Corona conviction

/ 08:21 PM May 25, 2012

Prosecution team members Rep. Miro Quimbo and Rep. Sonny Angara, Jr. INQUIRE file photo

MANILA, Philippines — The prosecution remains confident that Chief Justice Renato Corona will be convicted.

In a briefing Friday after the Senate, acting as an impeachment court, adjourned, Aurora Representative Juan Edgardo “Sonny” Angara, a spokesman for the team called the chief magistrate’s interpretation “absurd” and a “scoundrel’s interpretation” for being used as an excuse for the non-disclosure of four dollar accounts.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We might as well declare the Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth (SALN) Law unconstitutional.”

FEATURED STORIES

Marikina Representative Romero “Miro” Quimbo called the interpretation “anomalous”, saying that it should be enough to convict Corona if not for his non-disclosure of his dollar accounts.

House of Representatives Deputy Speaker Lorenzo “Erin” Tanada III said their team was quite convinced Corona would be convicted, saying “delikado ang interpretation (niya) ng Foreign Currency Deposit Act [His interpretation of the Foreign Currenc Deposit Act dangerous].”

Article continues after this advertisement

He said that transparency through full declarations in SALNs was “the higher standard being asked of government officials.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Quimbo maintained that all “hogwash about the waiver is over and done with and passe. It’s too late. It’s an afterthought – a publicity stunt that isn’t going to work.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“Why is no one condemning the chief justice? It’s crazy,” Angara said, pointing out that if Corona’s claims were true, it should be easy to present relevant documents like passbooks to prove his case.

Lack of evidence was why the prosecution found it confusing “why people discuss Corona’s claims.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Quimbo said that they “realized what we had initially known, that the chief justice was not going to be a good witness for the defense. There was no degree of demolition on the prosecution’s case.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: conviction, Prosecution

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.