Defense motion seeking Angara inhibition ‘unfair’—Rep. Tañada | Inquirer News

Defense motion seeking Angara inhibition ‘unfair’—Rep. Tañada

By: - NewsLab Lead / @MSantosINQ
/ 05:48 AM May 08, 2012

Senator Edgardo Angara. FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—Prosecution panel members on Monday described as “unfair” the motion to inhibit filed by the defense against Senator Edgardo Angara on the basis of his relation with prosecution spokesman Aurora Representative Sonny Angara.

Quezon Representative Lorenzo Tañada told reporters in a press conference Monday that “it’s unfair to both of them” to think they don’t have separate minds despite being father and son.

Article continues after this advertisement

He described it as a “desperate move by the defense to try to impute certain malicious thoughts in the people’s minds that both don’t have independent minds to make certain decisions.”

FEATURED STORIES

Marikina Representative Romero Quimbo questioned the timing of the motion to inhibit and described it as “like an ambush.”

“This particular motion is certainly filed at a time which we feel is very suspicious. They could have filed it early on,” Quimbo said.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said that the bulk of the argument in the motion to inhibit was focused on the blood relations between prosecution spokesman Sonny Angara and his father, senator-judge Edgardo Angara.

Article continues after this advertisement

“If they suspected about ([their relationship), they should have filed (the motion) on the onset,” Quimbo said.

Article continues after this advertisement

He added that Senator Angara’s questioning during the trial was not biased for the prosecution and that it was actually critical of the prosecution.

“We don’t see any reason why it’s only being done now except for the fact that obviously they have been planning to do it,” Quimbo said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Defense spokesman Rico Paolo Quicho said in a separate briefing that they filed the motion to inhibit on the grounds of a possible “conflict of interest” situation.

He said that it was filed only now because the “facts, documents and evidence that will prove our motion only became clear now.”

Quicho denied allegations that politics was the issue behind the filing of the motion.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“We look highly upon Senator Angara and Representative Angara. It never crossed our minds to make it a political issue,” Quicho said.

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.