Vapes, HTPs less harmful alternatives to cigarettes – top health institutions | Inquirer News

Vapes, HTPs less harmful alternatives to cigarettes – top health institutions

By: - Contributor / @inquirerdotnet
/ 02:59 PM October 18, 2022

Vapes and HTPs are found to be less harmful alternatives to cigarettes, according to top health institutions

Vapes. Contributed photo

Public health agencies and medical organizations from different countries have acknowledged that vapes and heated tobacco products (HTPs) are less harmful smoke-free alternatives to cigarettes, and can help smokers quit.

Top health institutions in the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, Ukraine, Japan, China, and New Zealand have separately issued statements over the years affirming that smoke-free alternatives such as vapes and HTPs are less harmful than combusted cigarettes.

ADVERTISEMENT

Last September 29, the UK’s Office for Health Improvements and Disparities (OHID), formerly Public Health England, released its latest annual update on the “current series of evidence reviews about the health harms of vaping, by leading independent tobacco experts.”

FEATURED STORIES

It maintained that vaping is 95% less harmful than smoking.

“Based on the reviewed evidence, we believe that the ‘at least 95% less harmful’ estimate remains broadly accurate, at least over short-term and medium-term periods,” it said in the report.

The OHID also said it might now be “more appropriate and unifying to summarize our findings using our other firm statement: that vaping poses only a small fraction of the risks of smoking. But, as we have also previously stated and reiterated, this does not mean vaping is risk-free, particularly for people who have never smoked.”

The UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence said evidence suggests that e-cigarettes are substantially less harmful to health than smoking but are not risk-free.

“Many people have found them helpful to quit smoking cigarettes,” it said.

In a recent report, the United Kingdom Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment (COT) stated that “in considering the comparison of electronic nicotine and non-nicotine delivery system (ENNDS) use with conventional cigarette smoking, the committee concluded that the relative risk of adverse health effects would be expected to be substantially lower from ENNDS.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The UK Royal College of Physicians said that “although it is not possible to quantify the long-term health risks associated with e-cigarettes precisely, the available data suggest that they are unlikely to exceed 5 percent of those associated with smoked tobacco products, and may well be substantially lower than this figure. It added that e-cigarettes are effective in helping people to stop smoking.

These statements mirror the pronouncements of Filipino legislators who overwhelmingly approved Republic Act No. 11900 or the Vaporized Nicotine and Non-nicotine Products Regulation Act which became law on July 25, 2022, to regulate the importation, manufacture, sale, packaging, distribution, use and communication of vaping products such as e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products.

Health regulators from other countries also agree that these novel products carry just a small fraction of the risks of smoking cigarettes. So it is because, unlike cigarette smoking which involves combustion and generates smoke that releases harmful chemicals, the electronic nicotine delivery systems involve heating that generates vapor or aerosol.

The German Cancer Research Center said in 2020 that, “the aerosol from tobacco heating systems contains lower toxin levels than tobacco smoke” and that “consumers are exposed to a lower level of toxins than when smoking.”

In 2018, the German Bureau of Federal Risk Assessment said, “the volumes of volatile and semi-volatile compounds in the emissions are even 97 percent to 99 percent lower in the tobacco heater compared to conventional cigarettes.”

In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration said it sees “the possibility for ENDS products like e-cigarettes to provide a potentially less harmful alternative for currently addicted individual adult smokers who still want to get access to satisfying levels of nicotine without many of the harmful effects that come with the combustion of tobacco.”

In 2020, the US FDA cited studies showing that switching completely from combusted cigarettes to the tobacco heating system significantly reduces the body’s exposure to 15 specific harmful and potentially harmful chemicals.

The US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine said that “while e-cigarettes are not without health risks, they are likely to be far less harmful than combustible tobacco cigarettes” and that there is substantial evidence that “exposure to potentially toxic substances from e-cigarettes is significantly lower compared with combustible tobacco cigarettes.”

“Smoke-free tobacco/nicotine products, as available on the American market, while not risk-free, carry substantially less risk of death and may be easier to quit than cigarettes,” according to the American Association of Public Health Physicians.

“Smokers who have tried, but failed to quit using medical guidance and pharmaceutical products, and smokers unable or uninterested in quitting, should consider switching to a less hazardous smoke-free tobacco/nicotine product for as long as they feel the need,” the association said.

The Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment stated in 2018 that the use of heat sticks is harmful to health but probably less harmful than smoking tobacco cigarettes based on the RIVM National Institute for Public Health and the Environment’s research on heated tobacco products.

The National Institute of Cardiology of Ukraine said switching to these products “prevents impairment of oxygen transport function of the blood, injury of the vascular endothelium and development of pro-atherogenic alterations in lipid metabolism and blood lipoproteins.”

In Canada, the government’s official website said, “vaping is less harmful than smoking” and “completely replacing cigarette smoking with vaping will reduce exposure to harmful chemicals.”

In Asia, the Japan National Institute of Health said in 2017 that the concentration levels of hazardous compounds in the mainstream aerosol of heated tobacco are much lower than those in conventional combustion cigarettes.

In a 2018 study, the China National Tobacco Quality Supervision and Test Centre said that besides some carbonyls, ammonia and N-nitrosoanabasine, the tobacco heating system delivered fewer harmful constituents than the conventional cigarette.

Meanwhile, the New Zealand Ministry of Health said it “considers vaping products could disrupt inequities and contribute to Smokefree 2025”.

“The evidence on vaping products indicates they carry much less risk than smoking cigarettes but are not risk-free. Evidence is growing that vaping can help people to quit smoking. There is no international evidence that vaping products are undermining the long-term decline in cigarette smoking among adults and youth, and may in fact be contributing to it,” the ministry said.

RELATED STORY

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Int’l scientific studies deny link between vaping and youth smoking

TAGS: Health, Smoking, vapes

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.