Cebu lawyers’ case vs IATF welcome, but national policies legally binding – DOJ chief | Inquirer News

Cebu lawyers’ case vs IATF welcome, but national policies legally binding – DOJ chief

/ 03:33 AM June 23, 2021

Justice Secretary Menardo Guevarra (File photo by TOTO LOZANO / Presidential Photographers Division)

MANILA, Philippines — The case filed by Cebu-based lawyers seeking to stop the national government’s COVID-19 quarantine protocols from being implemented in their province is “most welcome,” Justice Secretary Menardo Guevarra said on Tuesday.

However, Guevarra reminded that resolutions from the Inter-Agency Task Force for the Management of Emerging Infectious Diseases (IATF) — which placed the 10-day mandatory quarantine for passengers arriving in the country from abroad — were legally binding.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The filing of a case by the Cebu lawyers is most welcome. It provides a judicial forum for the settlement of an important legal issue that may crop up again in the future. The OSG [Office of the Solicitor General] will handle the case for the government,” the Guevarra told reporters.

FEATURED STORIES

“But let me say now that IATF resolutions acquire legally binding force because they are adopted by the president through an enabling executive order. As such, these IATF resolutions apply with equal force in every nook and cranny of our country,” he added.

The issue stemmed from a petition filed by lawyers at the Cebu City Regional Trial Court requesting it to deem the IATF’s quarantine policy ineffective.

Article continues after this advertisement

The lawyers were referring to IATF’s Resolution 114, amended by Resolution No. 116, which requires arriving Filipinos to go under quarantine for 10 days and be tested for COVID-19 only on the seventh day, to ensure that any possibility of infection will be monitored and contained.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Cebu lawyers ask court to declare IATF reso ineffective

Article continues after this advertisement

The petition reflects the view of Cebu Gov. Gwendolyn Garcia, who has passed a resolution requiring testing on arrival and only a three-day quarantine — which ultimately was the reason why flights to the Mactan-Cebu International Airport were diverted to the Ninoy Aquino International Airport.

READ: Testing, quarantine protocols in Cebu stay – Governor Garcia 

Article continues after this advertisement

But in his Monday night briefing, Duterte said that he would not obey any court order that might stem from the issue, adding that this was not an ordinary issue because the country’s survival was at stake.

“I don’t want to lock horns with the judiciary. I said I respect it. But there are times that, you know… the courts can function normally and maybe grant injunctions,” Duterte said, speaking partly in Filipino. “But this time, I said they are put on notice that I will not be stopped. I will not obey the courts in the matter now of managing the pandemic.”

READ: Duterte says he won’t obey any court on issue of Cebu pandemic management

Guevarra also stressed that the IATF was created by Duterte, making it a qualified agency that acts on behalf of the president.

“Its actions are the actions of the president, unless reprobated by the latter,” Guevarra explained.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“Therefore, all local government officials, who are constitutionally under the supervision of the president, must align their policies, resolutions, and ordinances in accordance with the directives of the chief executive. otherwise, there will be chaos and disorder in our society,” he added.

[atm]
TAGS: Cebu pandemic protocols, DoJ

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.