House approves security of tenure bill on final reading | Inquirer News

House approves security of tenure bill on final reading

/ 05:40 PM December 01, 2020

MANILA, Philippines — The House of Representatives approved on third and final reading on Tuesday the bill seeking to strengthen the security of tenure of workers in the private sector.

With204 affirmative votes, seven negatives, and three abstentions, the lower chamber approved House
Bill No. 7036 that seeks to amend the Labor Code of the Philippines.

The measure prohibits fixed-term employment except in the cases of overseas Filipino workers, workers on probation, relievers who are temporary replacements of absent regular employees whose engagements shall not exceed six months, project employees, and seasonal employees.

Article continues after this advertisement

Nonetheless, the bill states that the rights and benefits of relievers, project and seasonal employees shall
be at par with regular employees consistent with the principle that all workers must be treated alike both as to the rights enjoyed and obligations assumed.

FEATURED STORIES

Businesses engaging in end-of-contract arrangements and labor-contracting may face administrative
penalties of a fine or even the possible closure of their businesses.

Under the bill, labor-only contracting happens when any of the following conditions are
present:

Article continues after this advertisement

–   The contractor does not have substantial capital or investment in the form of tools, equipment,
machinery, work premises, among others;

Article continues after this advertisement

–   The contractor has no control over the workers’ methods and means of accomplishing their work;

Article continues after this advertisement

–   The contractor’s workers are performing activities which are directly related to the principal business
of the employer.

In July 2019, President Rodrigo Duterte vetoed the Security of Tenure Bill, saying that while labor-only contracting must be prohibited, legitimate job-contracting should be allowed” provided that the contractor is “well capitalized, has sufficient investments, and affords its employees all the benefits.” [ac]

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.