Gamboa claims he has no power to suspend cops involved in Sulu shooting | Inquirer News

Gamboa claims he has no power to suspend cops involved in Sulu shooting

/ 02:02 PM August 19, 2020

MANILA, Philippines — Philippine National Police (PNP) chief Gen. Archie Gamboa said he has no power to suspend the nine policemen involved in the shooting of four military intelligence officers in Sulu last July, unless they have been found guilty of charges against them.

During the Senate public order committee investigation on Wednesday, Gamboa said he can only place the nine cops under restrictive custody. Gamboa made the statement after Senator Risa Hontiveros inquired why the policemen involved in the shooting have yet to be administratively suspended.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Bakit hindi sila administratively suspended man lang halos dalawang buwan na? Are [they] still performing their functions?” the senator asked Gamboa.

FEATURED STORIES

In response, Gamboa said his power as the PNP chief is limited in terms of suspending police officers

“They are not administratively suspended because we cannot do so. The chief PNP’s power…. is only restrictive custody, that is the most that we can do under our regulation, we cannot even detain them. We cannot even preventively suspend them unless there’s due process,” Gamboa said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“What happens is that cases are filed, investigated and if they are found guilty of the administrative charge, they can be suspended, but there is no such thing as suspension prior to any administrative proceedings. We cannot do that in the PNP,” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Atty. Alfegar Triambulo, inspector general of the PNP’s Internal Affairs Service, explained to the committee that police officers in restrictive custody will still be able to perform their duties but their movements will be restricted.

Article continues after this advertisement

“They are still police, they will perform duties as a policeman but their movement is restricted to ensure their presence during investigations… nandiyan po sila,” Triambulo said.

Philippine National Police (PNP) Chief Gen. Archie Gamboa takes his oath before the Committee on Public Order and Dangerous Drugs looking into the fatal shooting of four soldiers allegedly by PNP personnel in Sulu during Wednesday’s hybrid hearing, August 19, 2020. Joseph Vidal/ Senate PRIB

But the retention of the status of the nine police officers puzzled Hontiveros.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Di ko ma-imagine matapos ang dalawang buwan na ganyang shooting incident, apat ang namatay at hanggang ngayon naghihintay ng katarungan ang mga pamilya nila, bukod pa sa AFP (Armed Forces of the Philippines), ay ni walang pagbabago sa status nila,” she said.

The National Bureau of Investigation earlier filed a murder complaint against the nine police officers for the death of Major Marvin Indammog, Captain Irwin Managuelod, Sergeant Jaime Velasco Jr., and Corporal Abdal Asula.

They were dispatched by the Joint Intelligence Task Group and the Task Force Sulu after technical intelligence detected the possible location of two female suicide bombers and the maker of their suicide vests.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

An investigation by the NBI showed that the police officers simultaneously attacked the Army Intelligence officers without “the opportunity to defend themselves.”

Contrary to the claims of the police that one of the victims has a gun, the NBI said witnesses said that Indammog did not carry a firearm when he alighted from their vehicle.

EDV
TAGS: Nation, News, Sulu shooting

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.