Pimentel affirms Senate's position to maintain ratified budget bill | Inquirer News

Pimentel affirms Senate’s position to maintain ratified budget bill

By: - Reporter / @ConsINQ
/ 03:48 PM March 16, 2019

Pimentel affirms Senate's position to maintain ratified budget bill

Sen. Aquilino Pimentel III. INQUIRER file photo

MANILA, Philippines — Senator Koko Pimentel on Saturday said Senate was correct on maintaining ratified version of the 2019 national budget and it should not have been itemized after ratification.

“Sa aking palagay, the Senate position is correct. Wala nang galawan. Kahit magdagdag ka ng centavo dun, wala ng galawan dun. Re-enacted na ang bicameral conference report,” Pimentel, former Senate President, said over local radio station DWIZ.

Article continues after this advertisement

(For me, the Senate position is correct. [The budget] should not have been tweaked. Even if you add a centavo, it should not have been tweaked. The bicameral conference report has already been re-enacted.)

FEATURED STORIES

The P3.8-trillion proposed 2019 national budget has yet to be passed for signature of the President. Senate has been urging to maintain the ratified version of the budget bill while House of Representatives said they itemized after both chambers of Congress ratified it.

READ: After months of delay, Congress finally ratifies 2019 budget

Article continues after this advertisement

The House budget bill was already transmitted to Senate for the signature of the Senate President.

Article continues after this advertisement

However, Senate President Vicente Sotto III revealed that he would not sign the budget bill with House amendments as it would violate the Revised Penal Code and the Constitution.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Sotto: Modified budget bill contains P96B House realignments

Pimentel then likened the ratified budget to “touch move” rule in chess, saying that the budget should not have been tweaked after it was ratified by Senate and House.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Dapat after ng bicameral conference ratification, in-approve na yung budget. Tawag dun touch move. Wala nang balikan, wala nang galawan. Ito na yun kung ano yung in-approve ninyo, ‘Yun na yun,” he said.

(After the bicameral conference ratification, the budget was already approved. That’s what we call touch move. There should not have been a review, it should not have been tweaked.)

Meanwhile, Pimentel expressed dismay over the feud between House and Senate as the budget bill has yet to be passed for the President’s signature.

“Nakakalungkot kasi both Houses dominado ng supporters o alyado ni Presidente Duterte and this is the president’s budget. Hindi namin madeliver sa kanya,” he said.

(It is disappointing because both [chambers] of Congress are dominated with supporters and allies of President Rodrigo Duterte and this is the President’s budget. We can’t deliver it to him.)

The senator then lamented that if there was an existing lump-sum appropriations in the ratified budget, the Supreme Court should look into it and render it constitutional.

“‘Yun ang nakakalungkot. Kung lump sum man yun na in-approve namin, then let it be questioned sa Supreme Court. Let it be declared unconstitutional, so be it,” he said. /jpv

RELATED STORIES:

Lacson says Arroyo may face raps over ‘falsified’ 2019 budget

Andaya: Senate stand on budget will restore huge allocations of ex-House execs

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Senate-realigned P11B infra fund to hurt ‘Build, Build, Build’ — Marcoleta

TAGS: budget, Congress, Local news, Pimentel, Senate

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.