Drilon doesn’t mind if impeach rap vs justice will worsen SC-Palace rift | Inquirer News

Drilon doesn’t mind if impeach rap vs justice will worsen SC-Palace rift

By: - Reporter / @MAgerINQ
/ 06:04 PM December 08, 2011

MANILA, Philippines—If the impeachment move against Supreme Court Associate Justice Mario del Castillo would further widen the rift between Malacañang and the Supreme Court, then so be it, Senator Franklin Drilon said on Thursday.

But Drilon, a staunch ally of President Benigno Aquino, strongly denied that Malacañang or the Liberal Party was behind the renewed impeachment bid against del Castillo.

“Yung pag-impeach po sa isang mahistrado ng Korte Suprema ay sang-ayon sa kapangyarihan ng Kamara sa ilalim ng Saligang Batas (The impeachment of a Supreme Court magistrate is based on the power of Congress as enshrined in the Constitution),” he told reporters.

Article continues after this advertisement

The decision of the high tribunal to dismiss the case against del Castillo for plagiarism, Drilon said, was not binding on the House of Representatives, which he said has the sole prerogative of “passing judgment on the impeachability of the constitutional officials.”

FEATURED STORIES

“Whether it worsens the relations or not, to me, is beside the point. What’s important is that this is a process allowed under our Constitution,” said the senator.

“If it worsens the relationship, so be it. Wala po tayong magagawa kung dahilan dito ay magwo-worsen ang relasyon ng Supreme Court at Palasyo. Sa akin, ito’y isang bagay nakalagay sa Saligang Batas (We can’t do anything if this would worsen the relationship between the Supreme Court and the Palace. For me, this is something that is stipulated in the Constitution),” he further said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Impeachment, Judiciary, Plagiarism, Politics, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.