Education Minister Ong Ye Kung giving his keynote address at the 3rd International Congress on Vocational and Professional Education and Training in Switzerland, on June 7, 2018.PHOTO: MOE
Combining the best of Switzerland’s emphasis on vocational training with Singapore’s more academic-oriented education system will help students prepare for a future of disruption. But at the same time, society has to broaden its notion of success, said Education Minister Ong Ye Kung.
In his keynote address yesterday at the 3rd International Congress on Vocational and Professional Education and Training in Switzerland, he said: “What we are aiming to develop will be a combination of the best parts of the Singapore and Swiss systems – and probably other systems around the world. But the secret and deciding ingredients for success are still societal norms, beliefs and culture.
“Society must broaden its notion of success. Meritocracy must also take on an enlarged meaning that represents opportunities and social mobility, and be commensurate with the multiple pathways offered by the education system.”
His counterparts, including Mr Johann Schneider-Ammann, head of Switzerland’s Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research, and United States Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos were also present. Mr Ong attended the conference during a working visit to Switzerland from Wednesday to tomorrow.
In his speech, the minister noted that the Swiss dual-study system, which combines classroom study with workplace apprentice training, is of particular interest to Singapore. He highlighted its mentorship programs and the involvement of industry.
“Two years ago, I visited Swatch and saw how the company put aside intra-industry competition, and trained craftsmen for the entire watch industry. This is a national ethos rarely seen in other countries,” he said.
Singapore’s education system has also served students well, Mr Ong added, citing the good performance of the National University of Singapore and Nanyang Technological University in international rankings, and how nine in 10 graduates are able to find jobs within six months of graduation.
But both systems has its issues. Over-specializing in skills can make students vulnerable to disruption, while Singapore’s traditional emphasis on academic excellence “has inadvertently made our students too ‘book smart’, and lacking the innovative spirit, entrepreneurial zest and survival instinct needed in the real world”.
Hence the need to combine the best of both systems.
Through mastery in a chosen field, workers can continue to be relevant, bring to the table skills which machines cannot, and innovate. But to achieve mastery, one needs passion, and education systems need to guide each student to recognize and uncover them.
“That is why Singapore has included Education and Career Counseling in our school curriculum,” said Mr Ong.
The aim is a system with multiple paths to success.
A student who is interested in a technical or craft-based profession “may have to undergo the requisite technical training and industry practice, which may or may not involve a university education”, said Mr Ong.
“On the other hand, the university landscape cannot be overly dominated by academic programs. It must include other professional studies, applied learning pathways, and work-learn degree programs, modeled after the Swiss dual-study system…
“With mastery as the end goal, education and work need not be regarded as sequential processes. We should instead intersperse study with work, to maximize the value of both, because you learn better after you put things into practice, and vice versa.”