Carpio: SC not adversely affected by issues surrounding Sereno | Inquirer News

Carpio: SC not adversely affected by issues surrounding Sereno

/ 06:13 PM June 08, 2018

Acting Chief Justice Antonio Carpio on Friday assured that operation of the Supreme Court has not been adversely affected by the recent controversies surrounding former Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno.

“We function normally because we’re still 14 in the Supreme Court. We have a quorum in all our cases,” Carpio told reporters in a chance interview during the Supreme Court’s 117th anniversary.

Carpio said they are already used to the noises and protests related to controversial cases like the quo warranto petition that led to Sereno’s ouster.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Both sides go to the media for their position so we are used to that already,” Carpio said.

FEATURED STORIES

He noted that at the end of the day, they have to respect the decision of the majority.

“The Supreme Court decides and we must follow,” Carpio said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Carpio, the most senior magistrate, is one of the six justices who dissented with the majority in granting the quo warranto petition by Solicitor General Jose Calida.

Article continues after this advertisement

In his dissenting opinion, Carpio maintained that it is the Senate that has the exclusive jurisdiction to try and remove impeachable officials.

Article continues after this advertisement

“I belong to the minority. I lost but that’s it. I mean you win, you lose but we are governed by the rule of the majority. That’s how democracy works. Whether its correct or wrong, we just have to accept it because that’s how we can move on,” Carpio said.

He said they will soon decide on Sereno’s motion for reconsideration “because we also want to move on.”  /vvp

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.