Pimentel still supports Senate resolution urging SC to review Sereno ouster | Inquirer News

Pimentel still supports Senate resolution urging SC to review Sereno ouster

/ 06:46 PM May 31, 2018

Former Senate President Aquilino “Koko” Pimentel III on Thursday said he will not withdraw his support for the resolution urging the Supreme Court (SC) to review its decision to oust former Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno.

Resolution No.738 was tackled in the upper chamber early Thursday morning.

READ: 14 senators file resolution urging SC review of Sereno ouster

Article continues after this advertisement

Minority senators tried but failed to have the resolution adopted last night, the Senate’s last session before the legislative break.

FEATURED STORIES

Pimentel, who was recently replaced by Senator Vincente Sotto III as Senate President, said he is still supporting the resolution to merely express the opinion of the Senate on the high court’s decision.

“I did not sign to influence the court, I signed it to express the sense of the Senate,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

The former senate president’s support for the resolution was floated as the reason for the Senate’s reorganization. Fourteen senators signed the resolution electing Sotto as the new Senate President.

Article continues after this advertisement

Pimentel, however, insisted that Malacañang had no hand in the leadership revamp.

Article continues after this advertisement

The senator expressed confidence that the Senate will adopt the resolution, most likely in July, noting that 14 or majority of the senators have already signed it.

Pimentel said the resolution would help the people review the soundness of the controversial decision.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Under our system, decisions of the Supreme Court cannot be reviewed by any other court or any other body. Hence, it should be reviewed by the people,” he said, adding that it is not a an issue on constitutionality but a question of the soundness of the argument of the Supreme Court. /ee

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.