Senators baffled: P37M in SAF subsistence allowances withheld | Inquirer News
SENATE COMMITTEE HEARING

Senators baffled: P37M in SAF subsistence allowances withheld

By: - Reporter / @deejayapINQ
/ 07:21 AM May 23, 2018

SAF FORMATION Members of the Special Action Force (SAF) attend February’s mass oath-taking of 753 troopers who were promoted after battling terrorists in Marawi City last year. INQUIRER PHOTO / NINO JESUS ORBETA

Former officers of the Philippine National Police Special Action Force (SAF) were stumped for answers when asked by senators why they withheld P37 million of the allotted P59.8 million in subsistence allowances for 4,000 elite commandos and spent part of the money for other purposes.

The allowances, amounting to P900 a month for each trooper, are supposed to be released to SAF personnel every month, but the money was not remitted from February to December 2016 and from August to December 2017.

Article continues after this advertisement

At an inquiry by the Senate public order and dangerous drugs committee, Senior Supt. Andre Dizon, former SAF budget officer, admitted that P37 million representing part of the troopers’ daily additional subsistence allowance had been kept in his custody.

FEATURED STORIES

Dizon said that part of the money was initially spent for other SAF activities, including training, fellowship and allowances for troopers stationed at New Bilibid Prison (NBP) in Muntinlupa City.

Returned last month

Article continues after this advertisement

Dizon returned the P37 million to the SAF last month.

Article continues after this advertisement

The rest of the P59.8 million has not been released to the SAF, according to Dizon.

Article continues after this advertisement

Dizon, along with sacked SAF Director Benjamin Lusad and two others, is facing charges for alleged misuse of P59.8 million worth of allowances of SAF commandos.

Sen. Panfilo Lacson expressed disgruntlement at Dizon’s attempt to explain the delays in the release of the funds, after the former budget officer said that he could not immediately take care of the matter because he had been busy at his new post at NBP.

Article continues after this advertisement

“So you were holding on to that amount from 2016 to 2018?” an incredulous Lacson asked Dizon.

The official replied: “Sir, we were deployed at NBP, so we were confronted with [different] tasks.”

Dizon also told the senators there was no new comptroller at the SAF to whom he could immediately transfer the money.

Claiming ignorance

Lusad, the SAF chief then, claimed ignorance about the “specifics of the finance aspect” of the unit’s operation.

“Right from the start I had given the trust and confidence to my people … I was not involved in the specifics of the finance aspect,” he said.

Former PNP chief Ronald dela Rosa, who attended the hearing, told reporters that he learned of the unpaid allowances for SAF troopers only in the last two to three weeks before he retired last month.

“I called [Chief Superintendent] Lusad immediately. I confronted him about this and he said, ‘Sir, I can defend this.’ They only used the money for training and Bilibid,” said Dela Rosa, the new Bureau of Corrections chief.

But Dela Rosa said Dizon should have immediately released the allowances to the SAF troopers or transferred the money to the comptroller after he was assigned to a different unit.

Extremely delayed

“For me, at least the money was still released even though it was extremely delayed,” he said.

Speaking to reporters after the hearing, Lacson said the arrangement by the SAF officers appeared similar to a reimbursement.

“It took so long. That’s why I kept asking them … Why would you reimburse—because it seems like a reimbursement—only in May 2018?” Lacson said.

“If you received the money, say, in the second quarter of 2016, why didn’t you release it immediately? So would that establish intent to misappropriate?” he said.

Lacson said it was clear that had the controversy not caught the public’s attention after cases were filed against the SAF officers in the Office of the Ombudsman, the P37 million would not have been returned at all.

“If there was no threat to file with the Ombudsman, would they even think of returning or distributing [the allowances]? It seems not,” he said.

Dizon’s returning the P37 million was also suspicious, he added.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“Where did he get the P37 million? It seemed like an afterthought on their part and that was just forced on them. And since they returned it, what is the source of the P37 million?” he said.

TAGS: Andre Dizon, PNP‎, SAF Commandos

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.