outbrain
Close  

SC sticks to its guns on PAL retrenchment ruling

/ 07:04 AM March 27, 2018

The Supreme Court has stood firm on its decision that rescinded its supposed “final” ruling ordering the reinstatement of 1,400 Philippine Airlines (PAL) flight attendants.

The controversy over the tribunal’s Oct. 4, 2011 resolution was based on a letter written by veteran lawyer Estelito Mendoza.

ADVERTISEMENT

Voting 7-2 with five abstentions, the high court said the arguments presented by the Flight Attendants and Stewards Association of the Philippines (Fasap) in challenging its previous decision were “gravely flawed and mistaken.”

Fasap members had pointed out that Mendoza’s letter was already a second motion for consideration, which was considered a prohibited pleading under the tribunal’s own rules.

FEATURED STORIES

In its March 13 resolution, which was made public only on Monday, the magistrates said the country’s flag carrier, owned by tycoon Lucio Tan, observed “good faith” when it implemented the retrenchment of the flight attendants in 1998 to cushion PAL’s P90.6 billion in financial losses.

“Upon a critical review of the records, we are convinced that PAL had met all the standards in effecting a valid retrenchment,” the court said. —Marlon Ramos

Read Next
EDITORS' PICK
MOST READ
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.
View comments

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Estelito Mendoza, Fasap, Lucio Tan, PAL, PAL retrenchment, Philippine Airlines, Supreme Court
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.


© Copyright 1997-2020 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.