House approves budget reform bill on final reading

The House of Representatives on Tuesday night approved on third and final reading the budget reform bill, which had been certified as urgent by President Rodrigo Duterte.

Voting 158-8 with one abstention, the lawmakers approved “An Act to Reform the Budget Process by Enforcing Greater Accountability in Public Financial Management (PFM), Promoting Fiscal Sustainability, Strengthening Congress’ Power of the Purse, Instituting an Integrated PFM System, and Increasing Budget Transparency and Participation” (House Bill No. 7302).

The proposed measure seeks to strengthen the oversight power of Congress by monitoring and reviewing actual performance and results against targets and by holding government offices accountable for their financial and nonfinancial performance.

The bill also mandates the Office of the President to approve the Statement of Policy and the Medium Term Fiscal Strategy for submission to Congress, as well as the Bugget Priorities Framewok to identify priority areas for government spending.

The President is also given power to impound appropriations, subject to the approval of Congress. The said impounded appropriations could not immediately be used except by subsequent legislative enactment.

It also shifts the country’s current two-year budget validity to one year, with no provision for carry-over, except for a three-month extended payment period in the next fiscal year. This is to allow agencies to settle payments for goods and services delivered, inspected and accepted during the previous fiscal year.

The other key provisions of the budget reform bill include the following:

The bill also provides sanctions and penalties for failure to comply with the reporting and posting of requirements, among which are:

‘Impoundment provision prone to abuse’

Kabataan Rep. Sarah Elago criticized the impoundment provision embedded in the budget reform bill as it “heavily outweighs the positive impact” of the proposed measure.

“The impoundment provision creates a situation wherein the president can withhold fund releases when he deems the appropriations no longer necessary,” Elago said to explain her no vote.

If this provision is enacted, she said the President would have the power to discontinue funding programs and projects deemed no longer required and would in effect, “usurp the congressional power of the purse.”

“This power can be used by the president as a leverage to control the release of funds based on political motivation,” the lawmaker said.

“This essentially widens the President’s discretion over the national budget, clips the Congressional power of the purse, and can be abused to serve patronage politics and a looming dictatorship,” she added.

Read more...