US Supreme Court rules immigrants can be held indefinitely | Inquirer News

US Supreme Court rules immigrants can be held indefinitely

/ 08:22 AM February 28, 2018

In this file photo taken on January 31, 2017 The US Supreme Court is seen in Washington, DC. The US Supreme Court ruled on February 27, 2018 that immigrants can be detained indefinitely without bond hearings, in a setback for immigrant rights. The five-to-three decision was carried by the court’s conservative justices, who said immigrants detained in the United States had no right to periodic bond hearings. AFP

WASHINGTON, United States – The US Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that immigrants can be detained indefinitely without bond hearings, in a setback for immigrant rights.

The five-to-three decision was carried by the court’s conservative justices, who said immigrants detained in the United States had no right to periodic bond hearings.

Article continues after this advertisement

It reversed a ruling by the San Francisco 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which had set a six-month limit for detention without a bond hearing as long as the person did not pose a flight risk or a danger to national security.

FEATURED STORIES

Writing for the majority, Justice Samuel Alito argued that the appeals court had overstepped its authority by re-writing rather than interpreting the law.

“All parties appear to agree that the text of these provisions, when read most naturally, does not give detained aliens the right to periodic bond hearings during the course of their detention,” he wrote.

Article continues after this advertisement

In a dissent, Justice Stephen Breyer cited the Declaration of Independence, “in particular its insistence that all men and women have ‘certain unalienable Rights,’ and that among them is the right to ‘Liberty.'”

Article continues after this advertisement

“We need merely remember that the Constitution’s Due Process Clause protects each person’s liberty from arbitrary deprivation,” he wrote.

Article continues after this advertisement

Justice Elena Kagan recused herself from the decision.

The case involved a Mexican immigrant, Alejandro Rodriguez, who had legal US residence and worked as a dental assistant.

Article continues after this advertisement

He was convicted of a drug offense and theft of a vehicle in 2004, prompting an immigration judge’s order for his deportation to Mexico, which Rodriguez appealed.

He spent three years in detention while appealing his case, arguing that the relevant laws do not authorize prolonged detention unless the government proves it is justified. Otherwise, it would violate due process.

In the end, Rodriguez won his case against deportation.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“We look forward to going back to the lower courts to show that these statutes, now interpreted by the Supreme Court to require detention without any hearing, violate the Due Process Clause,” Ahilan Arulanantham, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union who argued the case, said after the ruling. /cbb

TAGS: detention, immigrants, News, Scotus

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.