Trump son-in-law Kushner loses top security clearance   | Inquirer News

Trump son-in-law Kushner loses top security clearance  

/ 09:06 AM February 28, 2018

US President Donald Trump (left) and White House senior advisor Jared Kushner (middle).  (AFP FILE PHOTO)

United States President Donald Trump’s son-in-law and senior aide Jared Kushner has lost his top-level security clearance, sources familiar with the matter said on Tuesday, a decision with potentially profound implications for the administration.

Two sources, who could not speak on record because the status of security clearances is classified, confirmed US media reports that the 37-year-old White House aide will no longer be able to access America’s most closely protected secrets.

Article continues after this advertisement

The White House – up to and including the president himself – refused to comment on the record, but officials insisted that the decision would not have any impact on Kushner’s role.

FEATURED STORIES

Still, Kushner’s loss of access to “Top Secret/SCI (Sensitive Compartmented Information)” casts serious doubt on his status as a powerbroker inside the White House and his ability to negotiate Middle East peace.

Kushner had been an integral part of Trump’s election campaign and, among White House advisors, is seen as something like a first among equals.

Article continues after this advertisement

The soft-spoken aide is married to the president’s daughter Ivanka Trump and has been a leading figure in efforts to reach a peace deal between Israelis and Palestinians.

Article continues after this advertisement

He has also been a strong proponent of Washington’s intensified support for the government of embattled Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Article continues after this advertisement

Politico and CNN first reported that his clearance might have been rescinded late last week.
The decision comes just days before Netanyahu visits the White House.

Former US negotiator Aaron David Miller said Kushner now risks losing “credibility” with interlocutors in the Middle East.

Article continues after this advertisement

“They know you can’t be reading about them,” he said, and “you can’t possibly know what you don’t know.”

Kushner’s lawyer had earlier admitted that he has not yet completed the formal clearance procedure, despite reportedly getting access to the most secret material contained in the president’s daily briefing – the crown jewels of US intelligence.

White House Chief of Staff John Kelly ordered changes to the clearance system after a top aide Rob Porter worked for months without full clearance because of allegations he abused both his former wives.

“I will not comment on anybody’s specific security clearance,” Kelly said in a statement.

Kelly has told Kushner he had “full confidence in his ability to continue performing his duties in his foreign policy portfolio including overseeing our Israeli-Palestinian peace effort and serving as an integral part of our relationship with Mexico.”

“Everyone in the White House is grateful for these valuable contributions to furthering the President’s agenda. There is no truth to any suggestion otherwise,” Kelly added.

Ivanka Trump’s level of security clearance has also been in question.

She recently visited South Korea and briefed that country’s president Moon Jae-in on new North Korea sanctions.

For almost any staffer other than Kushner, his future in the White House would now be under serious doubt.

He had already been forced to repeatedly revise statements to US intelligence and law enforcement about his contacts with foreign officials and his business interests.

He put himself firmly in the sights of special prosecutor Robert Mueller after secretly meeting Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak and Sergei Gorkov, a banker with ties to Vladimir Putin as well as attending the notorious “Trump Tower meeting” with a Kremlin-connected lawyer.

On Tuesday, even before the stunning news broke, close Kushner advisor Josh Raffel announced he was leaving the White House and Kushner was accused of breaking the “Hatch Act” which forbids, among other things, White House aides using their official titles in campaign statements.

And later on Tuesday the Washington Post reported that at least four foreign governments – the United Arab Emirates, China, Israel, and Mexico – had wondered how to leverage Kushner’s business and political vulnerabilities.

That sparked several calls from lawmakers, including Congressman Ruben Gallego, who took to Twitter to ask “what DOES Jared have to do to get fired?”

Boy wonder

The answer to that question remains unclear. Since the first days of this administration, Trump has seemed to believe there was no challenge too confounding, no conflict too intractable for his son-in-law to tackle.

Beyond resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Kushner was handed a to-do list that included solving America’s opioid epidemic, prison reform, and injecting the nation’s bureaucracy with entrepreneurial spirit.

In person, Kushner is polite and self-deprecating; offering little of the hubris the president has shown about his abilities.

“Jared’s done an outstanding job. I think he’s been treated very unfairly,” Trump said just last Friday. “He’s a high-quality person. He works for nothing, just so – you know, nobody ever reports that, but he gets zero. He doesn’t get a salary, nor does Ivanka.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

But Trump also indicated the decision on Kushner’s security clearance would be up to chief of staff Kelly.
“He’s going to do what’s right for the country. And I have no doubt he’ll make the right decision,” Trump said.       /kga

TAGS: Ivanka Trump, Middle East, Politics, Security

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.