Sereno had nothing to do with delays in release of survivorship benefits – SC exec | Inquirer News

Sereno had nothing to do with delays in release of survivorship benefits – SC exec

/ 04:16 PM January 17, 2018

Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno did not have any hand on the delayed release of benefits for retired justices and judges, a Supreme Court (SC) official told the House justice committee during Wednesday’s hearing on the impeachment complaint against the top magistrate.

Atty. Jocelyn Fabian, chairperson of the SC technical working group (TWG) on the special committee on retirement and civil service benefits, denied that Sereno had anything to do in the release of benefits to the surviving spouses, which took more than two years for the high court to decide on.

The House justice committee has been conducting hearings to determine the probable cause to impeach Sereno.

Article continues after this advertisement

Siquijor Rep. Rav Rocamora asked Fabian whether Sereno influenced her, in any way, to delay the release.

FEATURED STORIES

She answered: “No, your honor. Absolutely none.”

Some justices and House lawmakers believed that the creation of the TWG by Sereno and two other justices caused the delay in the resolution of 29 applications for benefits for almost two years.

Article continues after this advertisement

Lawyer Larry Gadon accused Sereno of violating the constitution for the inordinate delay in the release of benefits.

Article continues after this advertisement

The task of the TWG was to come up with a recommendation on the case of the spouses of retired justices or judges, whether they would still be entitled to survivorship claims prior to the effectivity of Republic Act No. 9946 on February 11, 2010.

The law grants spouses of deceased justices or judges the same benefits that must be received by a retired magistrate.            /kga

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: benefits, retirement, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.