Lagman: House should not be a copycat of the President | Inquirer News
ORAL ARGUMENT ON MINDANAO MARTIAL LAW EXTENSION

Lagman: House should not be a copycat of the President

/ 04:31 PM January 16, 2018

edcel lagman

Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman. (File photo by RYAN LEAGOGO / INQUIRER.net)

The House of Representatives should not serve as a copycat of the President, Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman told the Supreme Court Tuesday.

During the oral arguments on petitions to nullify the one-year martial law extension in Mindanao, Lagman said the House simply adopted the letter of President Rodrigo Duterte in citing the need for another 12 months of martial law in the region.

Article continues after this advertisement

“There is nothing wrong about a super majority [in Congress] but what is wrong if this supermajority becomes a copycat of the President,” Lagman said as he pointed out that a separate review should be conducted by the lower house on whether the extension would still be necessary.

FEATURED STORIES

He also lamented that despite his request he was not given a copy of the HouseResolution allowing the martial law extension.

“Despite request, Congress has not provided [us with] a copy of the resolution,” Lagman said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Solicitor General Jose Calida said Lagman’s petition should be trashed because the House resolution was not included in his petition.

Article continues after this advertisement

Lagman’s group, members of Congress’ minority bloc, filed the first petition against the martial law extension.

The lawmaker said they were only able to forward to the high court a copy of the House resolution only this month because they got a certified copy of the martial law extension resolution from the Senate. /atm

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Edcel Lagman, House of Representatives, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.