SC set to hear 4 petitions vs martial law extension | Inquirer News

SC set to hear 4 petitions vs martial law extension

/ 12:50 PM January 16, 2018

Anakpawis rep ariel casilao and Bayan muna rep carlos isagani zarate

Anakpawis rep Ariel Casilao and Bayan Muna rep Carlos Isagani Zarate. PHOTO by INQUIRER.net / RYAN LEAGOGO

The Supreme Court on Tuesday will hear the four petitions against the full-year extension of martial law.

Oral argument is set for two consecutive days—Jan. 16 and 17.

Article continues after this advertisement

The first petition was filed by the minority bloc from Congress led by Albay Representative Edcel Lagman, while the second petition was filed by the Makabayan bloc as well as human rights advocates and human rights lawyers from the National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL).

FEATURED STORIES

Both petitions stated that there is no more need to extend the martial law especially that the government itself declared that the Marawi siege is over.

NUPL and party-list congressmen Carlos Zarate (Bayan Muna), Emmie De Jesus (Gabriela), Arlene Brosas (Gabriela), Ariel Casilao (Anakpawis), Antonio Tinio (ACT Teachers), and Sarah Elago (Kabataan) said the extension would give way to “alarmingly intensified and increased human rights violations” allegedly aimed at “quelling legitimate redress of grievances against the government.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Petitioners also held a protest rally outside the Supreme Court.

Article continues after this advertisement

“If it is up to the AFP, they would place Mindanao and even the whole country under perpetual martial law so that they can operate with impunity. Until now, many of those who wished to speak out against what truly happened in Marawi are still afraid from government retaliation,” Zarate said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“What is clear though is that the Duterte regime still has not addressed the root cause of Muslim extremism and that the military answer to this problem could never solve it,” he added.

The third petition was filed by former Human Rights Commission chairperson Loretta Ann “Etta” Rosales.

Article continues after this advertisement

Echoing the arguments of the two other petitioners, Rosales said there was no longer factual basis to extend martial law and suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus in Mindanao since President Rodrigo Duterte already declared last October that Marawi City — the center of skirmishes between government troops and ISIS-inspired Maute group — has been liberated.

The fourth petition was filed by a group led by former Commission on Elections chairman Christian Monsod last ‪Friday afternoon. Aside from asking the high court to nullify the martial law extension, they also sought a temporary restraining order against its implementation while the petitions are pending. /je

bayan muna protest martial law extension in SC 3

PHOTO by INQUIRER.net / RYAN LEAGOGO

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Congress, extension, Human rights, Makabayan, Martial law, minority, Petition, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.