Carpio declines to testify in House probe | Inquirer News
SERENO IMPEACHMENT CASE

Carpio declines to testify in House probe

/ 07:04 AM January 12, 2018

Supreme Court Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio EDWIN BACASMAS / INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

Supreme Court Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio has declined to testify in the impeachment hearings at the House of Representatives against Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno, claiming “no personal knowledge” of the issues brought against her.

Carpio wrote Oriental Mindoro Rep. Reynaldo Umali, chair of the House committee on justice, on Jan. 10 declining the committee’s invitation for him to testify at the hearings.

Article continues after this advertisement

He previously asked Umali what questions the committee would likely ask him.

FEATURED STORIES

“I regret to inform you that I have to decline to testify on the matters mentioned for the reason that I have no personal knowledge of these matters,” Carpio wrote in response to four of the issues raised against Sereno.

The charges against Sereno include failing to declare her real wealth, buying a luxury car with government funds, and making questionable decisions without consulting her fellow magistrates.

Article continues after this advertisement

Carpio was the first of Sereno’s Supreme Court colleagues to decline the committee’s invitation.

Article continues after this advertisement

Late last year, four justices testified against the Chief Justice—Associate Justices Teresita de Castro, Noel Tijam and Francis Jardeleza, and retired Associate Justice Arturo Brion.

Article continues after this advertisement

Others have reportedly agreed to testify at the hearings, which will resume on Jan. 15.

Poll case, recommendees

Article continues after this advertisement

Carpio said he had no personal knowledge of the allegations that Sereno had falsified the high court’s temporary restraining order on the case of the Senior Citizens party-list group against the Commission on Elections, and that she had “lied and made it appear that they do away with the voting for the recommendees to the Supreme Court.”

Carpio pointed out he agreed that the Supreme Court should do away with

the practice of recommending the next members of the tribunal since the Judicial and Bar Council was not following the court’s recommendations anyway.

He also said he was out of the country for a “wellness leave” on June 19, 2017, the day Sereno allegedly “manipulated and delayed” the transfer of the Maute cases to Metro Manila.

Carpio also said he had no personal knowledge of the allegation that Sereno had hired an IT consultant with excessive compensation and without public bidding.

The senior associate justice said that he came to know of the hiring only after the consultancy contract was questioned and that the issue was still under discussion by the court.

Specific allegations

“I wish to state that unless the allegations are made specific, I will not be able to comment or testify on such other allegations,” Carpio told Umali.

Sought for comment, Umali said he “will discuss first with the impeachment team” Carpio’s decision not to attend the justice committee hearings.

Umali confirmed having received Carpio’s letter.

“As far as I am concerned, my questions to Justice Carpio were already addressed. But I will still ask my colleagues if they still have questions to him,” he said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

A vote of one-third of the 293 members of the House against Sereno will send the articles of impeachment to the Senate, whose members will serve as judges in the trial. —WITH A REPORT FROM VINCE F. NONATO

TAGS: Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.