Appeals court bars Ecija judge from taking Veloso’s testimony | Inquirer News

Appeals court bars Ecija judge from taking Veloso’s testimony

By: - Reporter / @JeromeAningINQ
/ 07:09 AM January 06, 2018

Mary Jane Veloso

The Court of Appeals (CA) has permanently barred a judge in Nueva Ecija from taking the testimony of overseas Filipino worker Mary Jane Veloso against a couple she had accused of recruiting her as a drug mule.

In an 18-page decision issued on Dec. 13, 2017, the appeals court’s 11th Division ruled that Judge Anarica Castillo-Reyes of  Sto. Domingo Regional Trial Court (RTC) erred when she allowed Veloso to execute a deposition from her prison cell in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, against defendants Maria Cristina Sergio and her live-in partner Julius Lacanilao.

Article continues after this advertisement

Court rules violated

FEATURED STORIES

The appeals court, which earlier issued a temporary restraining order, ruled that the process laid down by Reyes in taking Veloso’s testimony without giving Sergio and Lacanilao the opportunity to cross-examine Veloso violated rules of court and the couple’s constitutional right to confront their accuser.

“While we commiserate with the plight of Mary Jane and recognize the prosecution’s need to take and perpetuate her testimony, unless and until the aforementioned constitutional and statutory provisions are revised, modified or amended, we have no other option but to apply the same,” stated the decision, written by Justice Ramon Bato Jr.

Article continues after this advertisement

Stay of execution

Article continues after this advertisement

The other division members, Justice Manuel Barrios and Justice Renato Francisco, concurred in the ruling.

Article continues after this advertisement

Veloso was supposed to be executed in March 2015 but the Indonesian government granted her a reprieve so she and the Philippine authorities could go after her supposed recruiters and the members of a transnational syndicate that smuggles illegal drugs into Indonesia.

Police eventually arrested Sergio and Lacanilao, who were charged with human trafficking.

Article continues after this advertisement

Through their counsels from the Public Attorney’s Office, they asked the CA to intervene after the Nueva Ecija RTC rejected their plea to stop the taking of Veloso’s deposition and presentation of her testimony in the trial.

Veloso’s private counsels from the National Union of People’s Lawyers (NUPL) deplored the appeals court ruling.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“Her testimony is being prevented by our own courts, the Court of Appeals in particular, upon the behest of the accused illegal recruiters’ defense team, which is both disappointing and ironic,” NUPL’s Edre Olalia said.

TAGS: drug mule, Drug trafficking, Testimony

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.