Jinggoy granted bail by Sandigan, will be free today | Inquirer News

Jinggoy granted bail by Sandigan, will be free today

Jinggoy Estrada —INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

Detained former Sen. Jinggoy Estrada is poised to be released on Saturday once he posts bail of P1.33 million for his plunder and graft cases in connection with the pork barrel fund scam pending at the Sandiganbayan.

A Sandiganbayan source confirmed on Friday that the Fifth Division had granted Estrada’s second bail petition, but no copy of the resolution was made available to reporters.

Article continues after this advertisement

Bail was set at P1 million for the plunder charge, and P30,000 for each of the 11 counts of violations of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, the source said.

FEATURED STORIES

The source said the court’s resolution was transmitted on Friday afternoon to Estrada’s camp in his detention cell at the Philippine National Police headquarters.

The resolution denied Estrada’s motion to dismiss “for lack of merit.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The court said it reconsidered and set aside its earlier ruling dated Jan. 7, 2016, to grant bail to Estrada.

Article continues after this advertisement

The dispositive portion of the ruling showed that the Sandiganbayan justices were split 3-2 in deciding Estrada’s bail petition, with affirmative votes from Associate Justices Maria Theresa Mendoza-Arcega, Reynaldo Cruz and Lorifel Pahimna, who was the swing vote.

Article continues after this advertisement

Associate Justice Rafael Lagos, chair of the Fifth Division, and Associate Justice Zaldy Trespeses were the two dissenters.

The Sandiganbayan will open its offices on Saturday with a skeletal staff to receive Estrada if or when he posts bail.

Article continues after this advertisement

Estrada’s bail petition was denied by the court on Jan. 7, 2016, and his appeal was again denied on May 11, 2016. But Estrada filed on Sept. 12, 2016, an “omnibus motion” to post bail, citing insufficiency of evidence and humanitarian grounds.

In his omnibus motion, Estrada argued that the prosecution failed to prove that he was the principal in the pork barrel scheme, citing the Supreme Court decision that dismissed former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo’s plunder case due to the failure to prove the “corpus delicti.”

Estrada said that assuming the allegation that he pocketed P183.79 million was correct, the threshold amount of P50 million would not be met because the P183.79-million kickbacks would have to be divided among the four main accused in the case.

This means that the former senator’s alleged kickbacks would amount to only P45.9 million—short of the P50 million threshold for plunder, Estrada contended.

In the same motion, Estrada, a son of former President and now Manila Mayor Joseph Ejercito Estrada, maintained that he was not a flight risk.

The family of Estrada arrived on Friday afternoon at the PNP Custodial Center ahead of the former lawmaker’s impending release.

Estrada’s wife Precy and children Janella Marie, Joseph Luis Manuel, Julian Emilio and Julienne arrived shortly before 5 p.m. aboard two sport utility vehicles heading straight for the custodial center in Camp Crame.

Precy told reporters she had not seen a copy of the resolution by the Sandiganbayan Fifth Division granting her husband bail while the Estrada children expressed excitement over their father’s anticipated release.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Estrada has been detained at the PNP Custodial Center since his indictment in 2015 for plunder and 11 counts of graft in connection with the alleged misuse of P183 million in pork barrel funds.

TAGS: Sandiganbayan

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.