In book, Clinton admits mistakes, casts blame for 2016 loss

/ 01:39 PM September 09, 2017

In this April 6, 2017 file photo, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks during the Women in the World Summit in New York. In a candid and pointed new book, Clinton relives her stunning defeat to Donald Trump, admitting to personal mistakes and defending campaign strategy even as her return to the stage refocuses attention on a race Democrats still can’t believe they lost. (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer, File)

NEW YORK — In a candid and pointed new book, Hillary Clinton relived her stunning defeat to Donald Trump, admitting to personal mistakes and defending campaign strategy even as her return to the stage refocused attention on a race Democrats still cannot believe they lost.

Clinton was unsparing in her criticism of Trump and also laid out some of the factors she believed contributed to her loss: interference from Russian hackers, accusations leveled at her by former Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director James Comey, a divisive primary battle with Bernie Sanders, even her gender. She also addressed common criticisms of her campaign, including the idea that she did not have a compelling narrative for seeking the presidency and that she ignored Midwestern turf where Trump picked up enough white working-class voters to win several battleground states.


“Some critics have said that everything hinged on me not campaigning enough in the Midwest,” Clinton wrote in the book titled “What Happened”. ”And I suppose it is possible that a few more trips to Saginaw or a few more ads on the air in Waukesha could have tipped a couple of thousand voters here or there.”

“But let’s set the record straight: we always knew that the industrial Midwest was crucial to our success, just as it had been for Democrats for decades, and contrary to the popular narrative, we didn’t ignore those states,” she wrote.


Clinton already took some criticism — complete with mockery from late-night television hosts — for planning book-tour stops in the Great Lakes and Midwestern states that ultimately cost her the election. But she wrote that her campaign had more staff and spent more on advertising in both Michigan and Pennsylvania, two states she lost, than President Barack Obama did when he won them in 2012.

She acknowledged that “if there’s one place where we were caught by surprise, it was Wisconsin,” saying that polls showed her ahead until the end. But while she did not visit the state in the fall, she noted that her surrogates blanketed the state.

In Wisconsin, Democratic pollster Paul Maslin called it a “bitter irony” that Clinton is now trying to reach voters — or consumers — in states he believed the Clinton campaign mostly ignored. But he said it is ultimately a side show from a has-been.

“Let her do whatever she’s going to do for whatever reason she’s doing it, but it doesn’t matter. There’s just so much else happening every day with Trump,” Maslin said. He hoped Clinton understands that “most Democrats are beyond” blaming her for November. “For her sake, I hope she can sell enough books, but if she thinks she’s affecting the debate in any way, I think she’s more delusional than anyone thought.”

Clinton’s anger is most sharply focused on Comey. She said that all of the theories about why she lost need “to be tested against the evidence that I was winning until October 28, when Jim Comey injected emails back into the election.”

She called her use of a private email server while serving at the State Department “dumb” but accused Comey of tarnishing her image and called him “rash” for publicly re-opening the probe in the campaign’s final days. She also owned up to other mistakes, saying her comment about putting coal miners out of business was the mistake “I regret the most” and that her paid speeches to Wall Street banks were bad “optics.”

Many Democrats have viewed Clinton’s return to the spotlight with trepidation, fearing it could trigger another round of infighting over the future of the party between her more centrist supporters and Sanders’ progressives.


Michigan Democratic Chairman Brandon Dillon, whose state Clinton lost by about 10,000 votes, said Clinton’s book can help Democrats try to “learn the right lessons from 2016.” But he said Democrats and other activists on the left should avoid using Clinton’s re-emergence to rehash 2016.

“There’s a clear difference between all Democrats and any of the Republicans. That’s what we should be focusing on,” Dillon said.

In a recent interview, Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon argued that history will render a favorable verdict on Clinton and her approach to Trump.

“All of these things she tried to warn people about that were a theoretical concern … now it’s real,” said Fallon. “He’s the president.”

In the book, obtained by The Associated Press ahead of its release date, Clinton was unsparing in her assessment of the president, calling him “a clear and present danger to the country and the world.” She said she considered saying to Trump: “Back up, you creep. Get away from me” when he loomed over her shoulder during a general election debate.

But Clinton, who has a reputation for avoiding blame for her failures, said she takes “responsibility for all” of her campaign’s mistakes.

“You can blame the data, blame the message, blame anything you want — but I was the candidate,” she wrote. “It was my campaign. Those were my decisions.”

She also expressed frustration over what she felt was unfair media coverage.

“What makes me such a lightning rod for fury? I’m really asking. I’m at a loss,” she asked her readers, before concluding: “I think it’s partly because I’m a woman.” KGA

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.
View comments

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: 2016, Book, campaign, Democrats, Election, Hillary Clinton
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

© Copyright 1997-2020 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.