DOJ orders CIDG to present key witness vs Peter Lim | Inquirer News
Tempers flare as defense lawyers question supplemental affidavit

DOJ orders CIDG to present key witness vs Peter Lim

By: - Reporter / @MRamosINQ
/ 01:03 PM September 06, 2017

DISINFORMATION? Cebuano businessman Peter Lim says a Chinese national and namesake who goes in and out of the country may be behind the disinformation about his alleged links to drug trafficking. Limwas interviewed by Inquirer correspondent and Cebu Daily News reporter Ador Vincent S. Mayol in Cebu City. —CEBU DAILY NEWS

Cebu-based businessman Peter Lim says a Chinese national and namesake who goes in and out of the country may be behind the disinformation about his alleged links to drug trafficking. CEBU DAILY NEWS / file photo

The Department of Justice (DOJ) on Wednesday directed the Criminal Investigation and Detection Group (CIDG) to bring a key witness in the drug trafficking charges against alleged drug triad boss Peter Lim and several others at the preliminary investigation of the case.

At the resumption of the hearing, the counsels of Lim and the CIDG engaged in a heated exchange after CIDG lawyer Joseph Orsos told the DOJ panel of prosecutors that witness Marcelo Adorco would submit a “supplemental affidavit.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Adorco, an alleged henchman of self-confessed drug lord Kerwin Espinosa, has been under the custody of the police in Leyte.

FEATURED STORIES

Citing logistical limitations, Orsos asked the DOJ panel, composed of Assistant State Prosecutors Aristotle Reyes and John Michael Humarang, to allow Adorco to sign his affidavit before a state prosecutor in Leyte.

But Magilyn Loja, Lim’s counsel, opposed Orsos’ manifestation, pointing out that her client was required by Reyes and Humarang to physically subscribe to his counter-affidavit on Aug. 24.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Peter Lim appears at DOJ, denies being the drug suspect alluded to by PNP

Article continues after this advertisement

She also noted during the hearing that Orsos had admitted that they were still preparing Adorco’s supplemental affidavit and other pertinent documents.

Article continues after this advertisement

“This is highly irregular. How can you tell us and the DOJ panel that Adorco subscribed to his affidavit voluntarily? Those documents do not even exist,” Orsos told the DOJ prosecutors.

The CIDG lawyer said Orsos had a “wrong understanding” of their request and that they were ready to file the documents with Adorco’s original affidavit.

Article continues after this advertisement

To which an infuriated Orsos replied, “I beg to disagree and take offense (to that). It’s the counsel of (the CIDG) who misunderstands and misrepresents what I’m trying to say.”

Reyes immediately settled the issue by ordering the CIDG to ensure Adorco’s presence at the next hearing on Sept. 12 to sign his reply affidavit before the panel of prosecutors.

He also clarified that what CIDG would submit was actually Adorco’s reply affidavit and not a supplemental affidavit as the latter would mean that there would be new allegations against Lim.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“Peter Lim went here to subscribe his affidavit. The proper procedure is for you to again bring Adorco here and have him subscribe his (reply) affidavit,” Reyes said. JPV

TAGS: CIDG, DoJ, Drug trafficking, Peter Lim, witness stand

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.