Colonel in 'Morong 43' case cleared for punching subordinate | Inquirer News

Colonel in ‘Morong 43’ case cleared for punching subordinate

/ 05:24 PM August 28, 2017

An Army colonel, who faces trial for preventing the “Morong 43” health workers from having counsels when they were arrested in 2010, was recently cleared of an unrelated case involving beating up a subordinate in 2012.

In its resolution, the Sandiganbayan First Division dismissed the slight physical injuries case filed against Col. Cristobal Zaragosa over the Ombudsman’s unreasonable delay in investigating the case.

The court thumbed down the Ombudsman’s justification that it took almost five years — from the filing of the complaint in 2012 to wrap up its preliminary investigation only this year — to investigate the case due to a “steady stream of cases” before the anti-graft office.

Article continues after this advertisement

The court said the case is a simple case of physical injuries, which “does not entail complex issues to be resolved or voluminous documents to be pored over.”

FEATURED STORIES

Records also showed that the Ombudsman’s graft investigation officer in investigating the complaint only dealt with a two-page complaint-affidavit with a single-page medical certificate, a police blotter, and a six-page counter-affidavit.

“Four years is too long a time for the Office of the Ombudsman just to finally come out with its resolution finding probable cause against the accused,” the court said.

Article continues after this advertisement

The court thus granted Zaragosa’s motion to quash due to inordinate delay, a ground violative of the accused’s right to speedy disposition of case and a ground for dismissal of the case.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Consequently, the Office of the Ombudsman is deemed to have been ousted of its authority to file the instant complaint against the accused-movant on the ground of inordinate delay; thereby warranting the quashal of the information in this case,” the court said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Zaragosa is accused of committing slight physical injuries under the Revised Penal Code against a certain Edwin Piodos, who was a staff/driver of the United Command’s Adjutant in the Eastern Mindanao Command (EastMinCom).

Zaragosa, then assistant chief of the United Command Staff for Intelligence of the EastMinCom, is accused of punching Piodos in the stomach, “in the guise of instilling military discipline to a subordinate officer” in Davao city in 2012, according to the quashed information.

Article continues after this advertisement

Zaragosa said even assuming for the sake of argument that he did beat up Piodos, he did so “as a brotherly reminder that a member of the Armed Forces of the Philippines can offer another comrade.”

Zaragosa is also co-accused in the case against police and military officials who are indicted before the Sandiganbayan for refusing the 43 health workers counsels when they were arrested at a resort in Morong, Rizal province, on Feb. 6, 2010, on suspicion of being communist cadres. The health workers came to be known as the Morong 43.

They are set to face trial for violations of Republic Act 7438 or “An Act Defining Certain Rights of Person Arrested, Detained or Under Custodial Investigation as well as the Duties of the Arresting, Detaining, and Investigating Officers, and Providing Penalties for Violations Thereof.”  JE

RELATED STORIES

Army, police officials in ‘Morong 43’ case seek quashing of raps

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Sandiganbayan to try generals for illegal detention of ‘Morong 43’ 

TAGS: Army colonel, case, dismissed, Morong 43, Trial

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.