outbrain
Close  

Sandiganbayan to try generals for illegal detention of ‘Morong 43’

/ 01:02 PM June 14, 2017

A file photo showing one of the 43 health workers arrested by the military in a raid in Morong, Rizal, thrusting a clenched fist as they are boarding their bus on their way to Camp Capinpin Detention facility in Tanay, Rizal. INQUIRER PHOTO

The Sandiganbayan will proceed with the trial of seven army and police officials who allegedly denied legal counsel to the so-called “Morong 43” health workers after their arrest in February 2010.

In a six-page minute resolution, the court’s Seventh Division denied the motion to quash filed by the defendants who questioned the validity of the charges over various technicalities.

ADVERTISEMENT

The court scheduled on June 29 the arraignment of retired Lt. Gen. Jorge Segovia, retired Maj. Gen. Aurelio Baladad, Brig. Gen. Joselito Reyes, Col. Cristobal Zaragoza, Police Supt. Marion Balonglong, Police Supt. Allan Nobleza, and Police Chief Insp. Jovily Cabading.

The officials argued that the informations for eight counts of violation of Republic Act 7438, the law governing the rights of persons under detention or custodial investigation, were invalid for charging more than one offense.

FEATURED STORIES

They claimed they were charged with violating both Sections 4(a) and 4(b) of the said law. Section 4(a) penalizes the failure to inform the arrested person of his Miranda rights (the right to remain silent and have a competent lawyer). Section 4(b), meanwhile, prohibits officials from keeping the person from conferring with a lawyer, a relative, a doctor, or a spiritual adviser.

No duplicity of charges

The court, however, said it had effectively settled the matter when it issued a finding of probable cause on Jan. 10 for violation of Section 4(b) of the law. Ombudsman prosecutors also expressed their intention to amend the caption in the charge sheets to prevent further confusion.

The court also rejected the accused’s “hyperbolic depiction” of the date stated in the charges. The accused said the prosecution should have been more specific in providing the date because “February 7, 2010 or sometime prior or subsequent thereto” could encompass all dates “from the dawn of time to the present day.” The court clarified that this could only refer to nearby dates.

 

Probe not delayed

Lastly, the court disagreed with the defendants’ claim that unreasonable delays attended the Office of the Ombudsman’s preliminary investigation.

ADVERTISEMENT

Siding with the prosecution, the court said the case moved continuously and only seemed to be idle from the submission of the last affidavit until the complaint was finally resolved.

Prosecutors had cited the “complexity” of the case and said the period of two years and five months was spent evaluating 10 counter-affidavits and the ensuing replies and rejoinders.

The court added that the defendants “have not shown how they suffered any more prejudice than is attributable to the nature of preliminary investigation.”

The case arose from the controversial arrest of the health workers whom the military claimed were communist cadres conducting explosives training in a house in Morong, Rizal province. The detainees went on hunger strike in protest of their alleged illegal detention, as they claimed to be tortured, threatened, deprived of sleep, and framed with planted evidence.

On Human Rights Day, Dec. 10, 2010, then-President Benigno Aquino III ordered the Department of Justice to drop what critics claimed to be trumped-up charges of breaking the firearms law. This paved the way for the detainees’ release. JE

Read Next
EDITORS' PICK
MOST READ
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.
View comments

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: arrest, illegal detention, Legal, Morong 43, Sandigan, Sandiganbayan, Trial
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.


© Copyright 1997-2020 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.