JV, Bam express apprehension over Alvarez proposal to easily dissolve marriages | Inquirer News

JV, Bam express apprehension over Alvarez proposal to easily dissolve marriages

/ 04:55 PM July 12, 2017

JV Ejercito

Sen. Joseph Victor “JV” Ejercito. (Photo from an INQUIRER.net video)

Some senators expressed uncertainties over the plan of House Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez to file a bill seeking an easy dissolution of marriages in the Philippines.

Senator Joseph Victor “JV” Ejercito pointed out that the country is “not yet ready to accept” Alvarez’s proposal that, if passed into law, would easily dissolve the marriage of a couple if both parties agree with it.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The problem is that our country is still 80 to 90 percent Christian,” Ejercito said in an ambush interview on Wednesday. “We are not yet ready to accept yung ganyan, kasi (yung) belief natin on (the) sanctity of marriage and family. Maybe later on but probably at this time medyo mahihirapan pa,” he added.

FEATURED STORIES

In Alvarez’s proposal, couples will be allowed to jointly petition a court for the dissolution of their marriage without having to go through the tedious process of annulment.

Senator Bam Aquino expressed his admiration for the winners and finalists of the 13th TAYO Awards. The winners and finalists, Aquino said, should serve as inspiration for other Filipino youth.

Senator Bam Aquino INQUIRER.net / FILE PHOTO

For his part, Senator Bam Aquino said that rather than passing a divorce law, the government must make annulment “more accessible to the public.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“Ako ang stand ko diyan, (me, my stance is that) we don’t necessarily need to pass a divorce law but we can make the elements of achieving an annulment cheaper and more accessible to the public,” Aquino said in a separate interview.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Kasi ngayon ang lumalabas yung nag papa-annul yung mga mayayaman kasi kaya nila bayaran (Right now, it appears that those who file for annulment are the affluent because they have the capacity to pay). Because if you make it more equitable, that’s probably enough,” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

The senator also admitted that he is unaware of what exactly the contents of Alvarez’s proposal.

“I think I don’t know if anyone here has filed a divorce law. I don’t know if yung dissolution na sinasabi niya (that he is saying) is also a divorce law. I don’t know exactly what his proposal is,” Aquino said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Both senators, however, pointed out that annulment is still a separation process for married couples.

Ejercito believes that the process of annulment is difficult in order to “preserve the sanctity of marriage.”

“Meron namang process, may (there is a process, we have) annulment. I think the intention of the law was to really make it hard because they wanted to preserve the sanctity of marriage,” the senator said.

“Meron namang ways. Kasi pag dumami na, mag-aasawa na lang ng mag-aasawa at mag-divorce (there are ways. Because if we increase the ways, many will just marry and then file for divorce and then remarry). I don’t think at this point our population as a whole is ready for divorce because of our predominantly Christian and Catholic population,” Ejercito added.

Aquino, on the other hand, believes that the expenses are a burden to married couples who wish to separate and that making the process of annulment easier should be prioritized.

“What I’m open to is making annulment easier and more accessible to public. Hindrance kasi yun costs, ang alam ko it’s not a priority here,” Aquino said. Airei Kim Guanga, INQUIRER.net trainee  / JPV

RELATED STORY

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Atienza tells Speaker to reconsider proposal to easily dissolve marriage

TAGS: proposed bill

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.