US opposes UN authorizing 5 countries to fight extremists | Inquirer News

US opposes UN authorizing 5 countries to fight extremists

/ 01:14 PM June 10, 2017

United Nations-Cuba-Embargo

AP FILE PHOTO

UNITED NATIONS — The United States is opposing a French-drafted UN resolution that would authorize military action by five countries in Africa’s vast Sahel region against extremist groups.

France’s UN Ambassador Francois Delattre says the African Union and the five countries — Mali, Burkina Faso, Mauritania, Niger and Chad — have asked for Security Council authorization for the force. He said this would be “the best tool” to combat extremism in the region.

Article continues after this advertisement

France circulated a revised council resolution Friday that would authorize the force from the so-called Group of Five or G5, and wants a vote, hopefully next week.

FEATURED STORIES

But a US official says that while the Trump administration supports the force in principle “as a potentially important example of African efforts to fight extremism,” it doesn’t believe a Security Council resolution is legally necessary for its deployment.

The official, speaking Friday on condition of anonymity because negotiations have been private, said the force already has a green light to go after extremists and “there is no compelling reason” to give it UN authorization under Chapter 7 of the UN Charter which is militarily enforceable.

Article continues after this advertisement

The US official said the G5 force should operate without UN approval, just as the task force operating in the Lake Chad Basin fighting Boko Haram does.

Article continues after this advertisement

But supporters of a UN resolution say that force never asked for UN authorization while the AU and the G5 have requested Security Council approval. They also note that the council has authorized the African Union force in Somalia, AMISOM, which is fighting al-Qaida-linked extremists of al-Shabab.

Article continues after this advertisement

Italy’s UN Ambassador Sebastiano Cardi, a Security Council member, said Friday the G5 are facing tough challenges fighting extremists, and they are also doing so on behalf of the international community.

“We think it’s absolutely important that the council recognizes the efforts of the five Sahel countries, supports their efforts and validates the mission,” he said. “These are poor countries. They are doing a lot. They need help.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The United States wants to cut $1 billion from the budget funding the UN’s far-flung peacekeeping operations for the year starting July 1, and while the draft resolution wouldn’t authorize any money for the G5 force, it does ask Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to report to the Security Council in 60 days on options to support the Sahel troops.

The US official, asked whether potential new funding was an issue, replied that the proposed resolution only asks for a report. The US government is “generous” in assistance to the five Sahel countries, and thinks the G5 force should be modeled on the force fighting Boko Haram, the official said.

The revised draft resolution would still authorize the G5 force for a year, despite US opposition. But it does address the proposed mandate of the Sahel troops which the US official complained was “too broad” and “lacking precision.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The new draft specifies that the force should be authorized to take “all necessary measures to combat terrorist groups” associated with the Islamic State extremist group and al-Qaida, and other groups designated by the United Nations.

TAGS: Africa, extremist groups, France, United States

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.