Sue solon, lease holders of Luisita lots, DAR urged | Inquirer News

Sue solon, lease holders of Luisita lots, DAR urged

Tarlac lawmaker says he didn’t rent area in sugar estate covered by land reform
/ 12:30 AM April 29, 2017

Agrarian Reform Secretary Rafael Mariano inspects a disputed property in Hacienda Luisita in Tarlac province.  —NIÑO JESUS ORBETA

Agrarian Reform Secretary Rafael Mariano inspects a disputed property in Hacienda Luisita in Tarlac province. —NIÑO JESUS ORBETA

The Unyon ng Manggagawa sa Agrikultura (UMA) has asked Agrarian Reform Secretary Rafael Mariano to sue Tarlac Rep. Noel Villanueva and those who rented or bought lots awarded to 6,212 farmers in Hacienda Luisita in spite of a 10-year prohibition set by law.

Danilo Ramos, UMA secretary general, said Villanueva “revealed himself as an ‘aryendador’ (one who rents lands) of distributed lands in Hacienda Luisita by acting as spokesperson.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Villanueva said he did not lease any lot covered by certificates of land ownership award (Cloa).

FEATURED STORIES

“If UMA thinks I committed an actionable wrong, they can file a case against me. There’s no problem,” he said on Friday.

Canceled JVAs

Article continues after this advertisement

In an earlier interview, Villanueva had articulated the concerns of businessmen who leased Cloa lands, after Mariano on Wednesday canceled the sale or lease of properties and joint venture agreements at Hacienda Luisita.

Article continues after this advertisement

Mariano acted on a month-long validation report which concluded that 2,800 Cloa beneficiaries leased or mortgaged their lands.

Article continues after this advertisement

The report said 600 Cloa holders sold their lots to third-party buyers and 200 others took part in joint venture agreements.

The validation conducted by the Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR) covered 5,031 Cloa holders in 10 villages in the sugar estate.

Article continues after this advertisement

The groups that leased Cloa land complained that Mariano’s decision violated “a constitutional guarantee of non-impairment of contracts.”

They also raised the possibility of unjust enrichment in the event they would be barred from harvesting what they planted.

In a statement, Ramos said, “If the cat is already out of the bag, Villanueva should be included among those charged by the DAR with renting distributed agrarian lands.”

Congressional inquiry

Ramos also called for a congressional inquiry to know why Villanueva, a member of the House committee on agrarian reform, was speaking for people who rented Cloa lands.

UMA identified a supposed subsidiary of a Hacienda Luisita-based sugar mill as one of the firms that leased agrarian lots.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“The congressman from Tarlac and all other aryendador should know that when the Supreme Court ruled on April 24, 2012, in favor of the farm workers in Hacienda Luisita, it stated, among others, that such lands should be always under the control of the agrarian reform beneficiaries,” Ramos said. —TONETTE OREJAS

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.