Ombudsman: Court must hear env't case vs ex-solon | Inquirer News

Ombudsman: Court must hear env’t case vs ex-solon

/ 02:17 AM February 04, 2017

SITE where at least 700 trees were felled for a road project attributed to Baguio Rep. Nicasio Aliping Jr. JP ALIPIO/CONTRIBUTOR

SITE where at least 700 trees were felled for a road project attributed to former Baguio Rep. Nicasio Aliping Jr. JP ALIPIO/CONTRIBUTOR

BAGUIO CITY—A regular court, not a graft court, must hear the environmental complaint filed against former Baguio Rep. Nicasio Aliping Jr. and three contractors for destroying trees for an illegal road project at the Mt. Sto. Tomas forest reservation in Benguet province, according to a ruling of the environmental ombudsman.

The decision, issued in August last year but released only on Feb. 2, said it found merit in Aliping’s arguments that the complaint was “cognizable by the regular courts and not by the Sandiganbayan.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The ruling addressed the motions for reconsideration filed last year by Aliping and the three contractors that sought to reverse the Ombudsman’s 2016 resolution, which found probable cause to charge them for violating environmental laws.

FEATURED STORIES

The Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) accused Aliping and the contractors of excavating a 2-kilometer road through the Sto. Tomas reservation straddling Baguio and Tuba town in Benguet.

The road excavation was blamed for debris that polluted a water source of the Baguio Water District. The illegal road project also destroyed 293 trees.

Article continues after this advertisement

The DENR filed the complaint with the Office of the Ombudsman, arguing that Aliping committed these violations in his capacity as congressman.

Article continues after this advertisement

But the Ombudsman’s new ruling said there was “no evidence that Aliping cut, uprooted or burned the trees in the performance of his official function as a congressman.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“Being acts done in his personal capacity, any offense arising therefrom is outside the jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan,” it said.

This was despite the fact that Aliping used his letterhead as Baguio lawmaker when he sent an official communication to Tuba to apply for an excavation permit for the property he bought inside the forest reservation, the ruling said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Aliping denied undertaking the road project, which, he said, directed traffic away from his property.

The controversy led then Baguio Bishop Carlito Cenzon, Lingayen-Dagupan Archbishop Socrates Villegas and the residents to seek a writ of kalikasan for the Mt. Sto. Tomas reservation.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Sto. Tomas is now shielded by a permanent environmental protection order. —VINCENT CABREZA

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.