Puerto employee denies unlawful reassignment by Mayor Bayron's son | Inquirer News

Puerto employee denies unlawful reassignment by Mayor Bayron’s son

/ 11:55 PM February 02, 2017

Puerto Princesa Mayor Lucilo Bayron (Photo from the Facebook page of Mr. Bayron)

Puerto Princesa Mayor Lucilo Bayron (Photo from the Facebook page of Mr. Bayron)

MANILA — A new twist has emerged in the grave misconduct and serious dishonesty case hounding Puerto Princesa City Mayor Lucilo Bayron weeks after Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales ordered his dismissal from public office.

The city employee found to have been illegally reassigned by Bayron’s son Karl came forward this week to deny one of the Ombudsman’s key findings for dismissing the Bayrons from public office.

Article continues after this advertisement

Morales earlier ruled the Bayrons guilty of grave misconduct for violating Civil Service Commission Memorandum Circulars No. 26 and 26-A, series of 1997.

FEATURED STORIES

These rules prohibit non-career officials like Karl, who was hired as a project manager for the city’s environmental watchdog Bantay Puerto, from exercising supervision over regular and career personnel.

However, in an affidavit dated Jan. 28, Rigor Cobarrubias denied that Karl detailed him to the City Traffic Management Office.

Article continues after this advertisement

In an affidavit released to media by Bayron’s camp, Cobarrubias said he was the one who requested Mayor Bayron, not Karl, to transfer him to the traffic office in September 2013 after working for the Bantay Puerto Program Night Patrol since July.

Article continues after this advertisement

“My reassignment to the City Traffic Management Office arose from the designation by Mayor Lucilo R. Bayron himself and Karl Bayron has nothing to do with it,” read the Tagalog-language affidavit.

Article continues after this advertisement

Cobarrubias also denied having ever been a regular or career employee, saying he was a job order employee as attested to by certifications from the city hall that he attached to his statement.

He said he did not know of the Office Order No. 001, dated July 1, 2013 and purportedly signed by Karl, that ordered his reassignment and served as one of the bases for the Ombudsman’s finding of grave misconduct.

Article continues after this advertisement

The issue regarding Cobarrubias’ reassignment was not the only one cited by the Ombudsman.

Morales also ruled the Bayrons were guilty of grave misconduct and serious dishonesty when they allegedly concealed their relationship in the contract of service for Karl’s engagement as Bantay Puerto project manager.

The July 1, 2013 contract of service with the younger Bayron specifically stated that he “is not related within the fourth degree of consanguinity/affinity with the Hiring Authority.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Morales rejected the Bayrons’ defense that they had no obligation to disclose their relationship because Karl was not considered a public officer by virtue of his “primarily confidential position.”  SFM

TAGS: Conchita Carpio-Morales, Karl Bayron, Lucilo Bayron, mayor

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.